1A-F: Betty Guthrie

Antique quilt banner with fourteen family names arranged in two rows.

Guthrie Family Group 1A · Branch F · The Next Generation

Betty Guthrie & Robert Chowning

Christ Church Parish, Middlesex County
and Caroline County, Virginia

Betty Guthrie, the eldest recorded daughter of William Guthrie and Lettice Burk, was born on 20 March 1718/19 and baptized on 19 April 1719 in Christ Church Parish. The parish register names her as Betty Guttery when she married Robert Chowning on 24 December 1735. She was sixteen.

Their children’s parish entries begin the story of a family later associated with Caroline County, Virginia, and with descendants in Kentucky. Follow the Chowning generations through parish registers, court proceedings, estate records, and the family lines represented in the Guthrie DNA Project.

Family at a Glance

Betty Guthrie

Parents
William Guthrie & Lettice Burk
Birth & Baptism
Born 20 March 1718/19; baptized 19 April 1719, Christ Church Parish, Middlesex County, Virginia.
Later Life
Identified in the family research with Betty Chewning, named in a Caroline County court episode in 1772.
Death & Burial
Exact date and burial place unknown. The 1772 reference records an event during her life, not her death.

Robert Chowning

Parents
Thomas Chowning & Sarah Davis
Birth
Born 20 March 1711/12, Christ Church Parish, Middlesex County, Virginia.
Later Life
Associated with Caroline County, Virginia, where published court summaries record wartime assistance to Robert Chewning.
Death & Burial
Reported deceased in Caroline County estate proceedings by 11 November 1785. His exact death date and burial place remain unknown.

Married 24 December 1735 · Christ Church Parish, Middlesex County, Virginia

The parish register records the Christmas Eve marriage of Robert Chowning and Betty Guttery by banns. Betty was sixteen. Their family includes Ruth, Charles, Christopher, Robert, and Easter. Birth and baptism entries name Robert and Betty as the parents of four of these children; Christopher’s place in the family is traced through the later Chowning research.

The best-developed descendant line follows Charles Chowning and Milly Stephens from Virginia to Kentucky. His 1817 will abstract names his wife, children, and grandchildren, including two daughters who remained in Virginia.

Sources: The Parish Register of Christ Church, Middlesex County, Va., from 1653 to 1812 (1897), pp. 87, 102, 143, 149, 152, 155, and 169; T. E. Campbell, Colonial Caroline, pp. 222, 376–378, and 457; descendant-supplied citations to Caroline County order-book abstracts and Middlesex probate abstracts; Charles Chowning will abstract, printed p. 21, citing will p. 204. Source distinctions and conflicting accounts are explained below and in Explore the Records.

Explore the Next Generation

Select a child’s name to follow their story and the next generation below.

Child Birth & Baptism Marriage & Later Life
Ruth Chowning Born 9 October 1736
Baptized 21 October 1736
No later record has been securely identified. The frequently repeated death in 1737 remains unsupported.
Charles Chowning Born 10 March 1738/39
Baptized 25 March 1739
Married Milly Stephens; their family continued in Virginia and Kentucky. His will was written 21 March 1817 and probated in May 1817 in Fayette County, Kentucky.
Christopher Chowning Estimated birth about 1740
No parish entry identified
Associated with Revolutionary service. A 28 November 1787 military-land warrant reportedly names Charles Chowning as his heir-at-law. No spouse or children have been identified.
Robert ChowningThe younger Robert Born 2 March 1740/41
Baptized 29 March 1741
Associated in the family research with Revolutionary service. His later life and death date require further documentation.
Easter ChowningAlso called Esther in later accounts Born 25 March 1743
Baptized 4 April 1743
The parish register uses Easter. No later marriage, death, or descendant record has been securely identified.
Family Evidence NotesOpen for parish references, family relationships, court records, and conflicting accounts.

Old-style years. The English year began on 25 March. The printed register gives Robert’s birth as 20 March 1711 and Betty’s as 20 March 1718; these are displayed as 1711/12 and 1718/19. Charles’s March birth precedes his baptism on 25 March 1739, so his birth is shown as 1738/39. The younger Robert’s birth is 2 March 1740/41, followed by baptism on 29 March 1741. The day and month have not been converted to the Gregorian calendar.

Ruth’s birth. The entry on printed p. 143 reads 9 October 1736, with baptism on 21 October. The 17 October birth on the preceding line belongs to Susanna Davis. Neither that date nor an unsupported 1737 death should be assigned to Ruth.

The children’s records. Parish references are Ruth, p. 143; Charles, p. 149; Robert, p. 152; and Easter, p. 155. Christopher’s approximate birth and position in the list are not established by a parish entry. The military-land evidence belongs in his individual account. An additional proposed son, William, born about 1745, requires a record linking him to this couple before he is added to the family table.

Betty in Caroline County. Campbell’s Colonial Caroline, pp. 222 and 457, names Betty Chewning and Samuel Daniel as refusing to appear as witnesses in proceedings involving John Waller and Henry Goodloe. Page 457 dates the episode to 1772; each was fined 350 pounds of tobacco. This is the published reference associated with Betty Guthrie’s later life. It does not supply her death date.

Robert’s parents. The parish birth entry names Thomas and Sarah Chowning. A descendant-supplied citation to William Lindsay Hopkins’s Middlesex County, Virginia 1673–1812 Wills and Inventories and Other Court Papers, p. 61, reproduces an abstract of Thomas Chowning’s will dated 15 November 1721 and proved 6 December 1721. It names children John, Robert, Mary, Sarah, and Jane, with Thomas’s brothers George and John as executors. This supports Robert’s place in the Thomas Chowning family. The abstract does not name Thomas’s wife; Sarah’s maiden surname Davis comes from the retained family research.

The marriage citation. The printed parish register, p. 169, records the marriage by banns on 24 December 1735. The descendant’s citation also identifies FamilySearch film 008190054, image 164 of 341. The supplied screenshot shows the citation and transcription; it is not a newly examined image of the underlying register.

The December 1777 petition. The published Sweeny transcription and the descendant’s citation to Ruth and Sam Sparacio’s Caroline County, Virginia Order Book Abstracts 1774–1778, p. 77, both name Robert Chowning or Chewning. The latter dates the court proceeding to 11 December 1777 and cites original p. 39. Robert was described as infirm and unable to support his family because his sons had entered United States service. Both accounts mention £16 and assistance for William Loyd’s wife and children, but their wording about the recipients and distribution differs. The original court order would help settle that distinction. Neither account names Robert’s sons.

Assistance and levy exemption in 1780. A descendant-supplied transcription citing Sparacio’s Order Book Abstracts 1778–1781, p. 79, records an allowance of £60 on 14 April 1780 for Robert Chewning, who could not support himself while his son was in service. A separate citation, p. 81, records his exemption from county levies on 11 May 1780, citing original order-book p. 228. These are two different court actions. Neither establishes Betty’s death or identifies the serving son.

Different amounts in Campbell’s tables. Colonial Caroline, pp. 376–378, lists Robert Chewning with one son in service and an award of £8 in 1777, followed by £12 in 1780. The asterisk on the later entry denotes a second award. These figures are retained as Campbell reports them. Their relationship to the £16 and £60 petition figures has not been resolved.

Robert’s estate. The family’s Caroline County research cites an administrator’s debt action on 11 November 1785, identifying Robert as deceased. The newly supplied citation to Sparacio’s Order Book Abstracts 1785–1786, p. 46, states that his inventory and appraisement were returned and ordered recorded on 8 December 1785; it cites original order-book p. 208. The inventory’s contents were not included in that citation. These estate references do not establish an exact death date.

A conflicting death account. The Virginia Genealogist extract headed “British Mercantile Claims,” printed p. 13, reports a Robert Chowning debt of £19.10.8 to Bell & Stanfield. It identifies his son Charles Chewning, then of Culpeper, as executor, but says Robert died in Caroline County “before the war.” That chronology conflicts with the 1777 and 1780 assistance records associated with Betty’s husband. The reference to Charles is useful family evidence, while the death statement and the executor/administrator terminology require comparison with the underlying records.

An earlier Robert Chowning. The Middlesex will dated 4 January 1697/98, naming wife Ann, belongs to an earlier man. It predates the birth of Betty’s husband and is not his will.

Charles’s will. The available typed abstract reports a will written 21 March 1817 and probated in May 1817. It names wife Milly; children Charles, Robert, Milly Tap, and Betsey Kemper; grandchildren through Lucy Stephens; and daughters Ann Vaughn and Sally Tass in Virginia. The abstract supports the family outline, while the original will would help settle surname spellings and the precise bequests.

Return to Menu ↑

Children & Descendant Families

Betty Guthrie and Robert Chowning’s family begins in the Christ Church Parish register and continues through the records of Caroline County, Virginia. Their son Charles and his wife Milly Stephens left the most extensive descendant trail, connecting the family with Culpeper County and several Kentucky counties.

The five children below follow the established family outline. Christopher’s birth is estimated, and his position in the birth order is uncertain. The next generation’s details follow the collected family research, with the principal record references and unresolved dates identified in the expandable notes.

1. Ruth Chowning

Born 9 October 1736 · Baptized 21 October 1736 · Later life unknown

Ruth was the first recorded child of Robert and Betty Chowning. Her birth and baptism appear together in the Christ Church Parish register. No later marriage, burial, or descendant record has been securely connected to her.

Ruth’s parish recordThe corrected birth date and the unsupported infant-death date.

The printed register, p. 143, gives Ruth’s birth as 9 October 1736 and her baptism as 21 October. The 17 October date sometimes assigned to her belongs to the preceding entry for Susanna Davis.

Some trees report that Ruth died in 1737, but no supporting death or burial record has been identified. Her later life remains open.

2. Charles Chowning & Milly Stephens

Charles: born 10 March 1738/39 · Baptized 25 March 1739 · Died between 21 March and May 1817

Charles’s birth and baptism are recorded in Christ Church Parish. He reportedly married Milly Stephens on 7 August 1760. Their seven children were born in Virginia, and the family later divided between Virginia and Kentucky. Milly’s name also appears as Milley, and her surname as Stevens.

Caroline County research associates Charles with the religious dissent of the early 1770s and with the administration of his father Robert’s estate in the 1780s. A later mercantile-claims account places Robert’s son Charles in Culpeper. By 1805, the collected tax records place Charles in Fayette County, Kentucky; the 1807 entry lists 75 acres on David’s Fork.

Charles wrote his will on 21 March 1817, and it was probated in May 1817. The available abstract names his wife, children, and grandchildren, including two daughters still in Virginia. Milly is reported to have survived beyond 1821.

Children of Charles Chowning & Milly Stephens
Child Life & Family
Charles Chowning Born 15 April 1764, Virginia · Died 1832, Jessamine County, Kentucky.

Charles married Tillitha Nicholson on 16 April 1796 in Kentucky. They raised a large family and settled in Jessamine County, where his 1832 estate is associated with will and probate records.

Their children are listed as Sally, William, Thomas, John, Charles, Robert B., Milly, James, Eliza, Lucy, Dennison, and Mary Ann.

Tillitha is reported to have died on 17 October 1864, aged 87, in Trimble County, Kentucky. Her burial is associated with Mount Tabor Cemetery there.

Robert Chowning Born 30 June 1766, Virginia · Died between 1840 and 1850, reportedly Owen County, Kentucky.

Robert married Mildred Walker on 1 April 1790 in Culpeper County, Virginia. Their nine children are listed as Louisa, Frances Marion, Lucy, Ezra Walker, Charles Guthrie, Amelia, Robert, Christopher C., and Amanda, born between 1790 and 1815.

The family research traces Robert through Fayette County tax records beginning by 1800 and continuing through 1808, followed by an 1810 Lexington household. He later farmed in Scott County, where the collected records describe 150 acres and five horses. He appears there in 1820 and is associated with a property sale dated 11 August 1825. Mildred is reported living after 1820.

By the 1830 census, Robert was in Owen County. He married Fanny Blackburn on 7 December 1835, when he was 69. Her marriage-consent letter states that she was of age.

Autosomal DNA participation: ✓ This is the descendant line represented in the Guthrie DNA Project through Betty Guthrie → Charles Chowning → Robert Chowning.

Anne Chowning
Ann Vaughan
Reported birth 12 February 1768, Virginia · Living in 1817.

Anne married a man surnamed Vaughan, whose given name has not been established. Her father’s will abstract identifies Ann Vaughn as one of his two daughters in Virginia.

Her marriage date, children, and later life remain to be traced.

Sarah “Sally” Chowning Reported birth 12 November 1772 or 1773, Virginia · Reported death 1834.

Sally married James Tapp on 5 January 1794. Their family remained in Culpeper County, Virginia.

Their ten children are listed as John (1795), Baylor (1796), Mildred (1798), William (1801), Charles (1802), Wyat (1804), Lucy (1806), Vincent (1808), Susan (1813), and Harriet (1817).

Sally is identified with the daughter rendered Sally Tass in Charles’s will abstract. James is reported to have survived her until 1860.

Lucy Chowning Reported birth 27 October 1774, Virginia · Reportedly died before 1817.

Lucy married a man surnamed Stephens. His given name and the place and date of their marriage have not been established.

Charles’s will abstract names four grandchildren as Lucy’s children: Milly, Lucinda, Mahaly, and Thursey Stephens. Their later lives remain to be traced. Lucy’s reported death before her father is retained from the family research; the abstract’s naming of her children alone does not establish when she died.

Mildred “Millie” Chowning Reported birth 13 August 1776 or 1779, Virginia · Died 24 January 1852, Kentucky.

Millie married Fielding “Lewis” Tapp II on 25 December 1800 in Culpeper County, Virginia. Their family is credited with eleven children:

Nancy (1801), Elizabeth (1803), Mildred (1804), Mariah (1806), Charles William Lewis (1808), Lucy Jane (1810), Pendleton “Washington” (1812), Preston Waller (1814), Francis Gregory (1817), Miranda Summerfield (1820), and Emily T. (1822).

Lewis died in 1822. Millie’s death is reported at Sycamore Grove, Jessamine County, Kentucky, on 24 January 1852, aged 72. The will abstract names her as Milly Tap.

Elizabeth “Betsy” Chowning Born September 1781, Virginia · Reported death in 1842 or 1843, Kentucky.

Betsy married Henry Kemper in Fayette County, Kentucky. The marriage license was dated 29 June 1805, with Charles Chowning’s personal consent, and the marriage was recorded on 30 June.

Their children are listed as Charles Henry (1806), John C. (1807), Nathan (1811), Elizabeth (1815), Lucy S. (1817), Mary Mildred (1820), and Sarah Ann (1826).

Henry died in 1827. Betsy appears as Betsey Kemper in her father’s will abstract. Her exact birth and death dates remain inconsistent in the collected accounts.

Charles & Milly: records, property, and the willParish and court references, the Kentucky household, and the distinction between an abstract and the original will.

Birth and marriage. Charles’s parish entry appears on printed p. 149. His 10 March birth precedes the 25 March 1739 baptism; the birth is shown here as 1738/39. The reported 7 August 1760 marriage to Milly Stephens has not been located in the Christ Church Parish register. Caroline County is a possible marriage location, rather than an established one.

Religious dissent and military associations. The collected research, citing Elliott’s history of Caroline County, places Charles Chewning with John Goodrich, Thomas Collins Jr., Micajah Stevens, and Edmund and Elizabeth Beazley in a 1771 unauthorized-worship case whose charges were dismissed. Campbell’s Colonial Caroline, p. 373, also lists Charles Chewning among Caroline soldiers and sailors. That list does not give the age or parentage needed to establish a particular military identity by itself.

His father’s estate. The retained Caroline County references name Charles Chowning, administrator of Robert Chowning, deceased, in a debt action against John Broaddus Jr. and John Houston on 11 November 1785, with a further proceeding dated 11 August 1786. The mercantile-claims extract identifies Robert’s son Charles in Culpeper, but uses the term executor and gives the conflicting death chronology discussed in the Family Evidence Notes.

Kentucky property and household. The collected Fayette tax entries for 1805 and 1806 list no land, one voter, one white tithe, four Black tithes and four Black persons in total, with four horses in 1805 and five in 1806. The 1807 and 1808 entries list 75 acres of first-rate land on David’s Fork, surveyed by Johnson and entered by Bradford, one white male over 21, four Black persons over 16 and four in total; seven horses in 1807 and ten in 1808, and a four-wheeled carriage in each year. The 1807 abstract also records no white males aged 16–20. These entries preserve evidence of slaveholding alongside the household’s land and other taxable property.

The retained 1810 Lexington, Fayette County census summary lists one man and one woman aged 45 or older, two girls under ten, and four enslaved people, making eight people in the household. The two girls have not been identified; their relationship to Charles is not stated in that census.

The 1817 will abstract. The supplied image is a typed abstract on printed p. 21, citing will p. 204. It gives the writing date as 21 March 1817 and probate as May 1817. It names wife Milly; children Charles, Robert, Milly Tap, and Betsey Kemper; Lucy Stephens’s children Milly, Lucinda, Mahaly, and Thursey; and daughters Ann Vaughn and Sally Tass in Virginia. George Berry and Lewis Bryant are named as executors, with James Daley and Thomas Nutall as witnesses.

The abstract supports Charles’s death between the writing and probate dates, but it is not the handwritten will. Its surname forms and the precise bequests remain subjects for comparison with the original. Milly’s reported survival beyond 1821 comes from the collected family research.

The seven descendant families: dates and open questionsReported dates, surname variants, and the evidence still needed for several later generations.

Charles and Tillitha. The family research labels their 16 April 1796 marriage as Jessamine County. The historical jurisdiction for that date needs to be checked against the marriage record; Kentucky is used in the family table. Their later residence in Jessamine County is a separate event.

Robert and his wives. Middlesex County is the reported birthplace for Robert on 30 June 1766; the specific birth record has not been supplied. His Scott County property is described in the collected account as being on the “McClure River,” a watercourse description requiring confirmation from the original record. An 1830 Fanny Blackburn household includes a woman aged 30–39, a girl aged 10–14, and a boy aged 5–9. This is a possible earlier household for Robert’s second wife, but the age groups alone do not prove her identity, widowhood, or the children’s relationships. Robert’s 1840–1850 death range remains the estimate used in the family research.

Sally and James Tapp. The marriage date is cited through Genealogy of the Cloyd, Basye, and Tapp Families. James’s proposed identification as a son of Vincent Tapp and Mollie Jett remains a genealogical theory. Sally’s birth year is variously given as 1772 or 1773. The will abstract’s surname “Tass” should be compared with the original before its spelling is treated as decisive.

Lucy Stephens. The supplied abstract reads Thursey for the fourth grandchild; other collected accounts use a different reading, including Hussey. Milly/Milley and Mahaly/Mahaley also vary between transcriptions. The original will and later records would help establish the daughters’ names and identities.

Millie Tapp. Her birth is reported as 13 August 1776 or 1779. The reported age of 72 at her January 1852 death is consistent with an August 1779 birth, but the conflicting dates remain until the underlying records are compared.

Betsy Kemper. The collected birth dates are 9 or 12 September 1781. The reported death dates are 2 April 1842 or 4 February 1843. Neither pair has been resolved by the evidence reviewed here.

DNA participation. Autosomal representation is recorded through Charles’s son Robert. A Chowning male-line Y-DNA test would follow the Chowning paternal line; it would not carry Betty Guthrie’s father’s Y-DNA. The visible project participation chart follows in Explore the Records.

3. Christopher Chowning

Estimated birth about 1740 · Military-land warrant dated 28 November 1787

Christopher’s place in the family is traced through later Chowning research and Revolutionary military-land references. No birth or baptism entry has been identified for him in the Christ Church Parish register.

The family research cites Virginia Land Office Military Warrant No. 4344, dated 28 November 1787, for 100 acres in consideration of three years’ service in the Virginia Continental Line. The warrant reportedly names Charles Chowning as Christopher’s heir-at-law, indicating that Christopher had died by that date. No spouse or children have been identified.

Christopher’s military and heirship evidenceThe reported warrant, service details, and limits of the heir-at-law designation.

The warrant number, date, acreage, service term, and heir’s name are retained from the collected family research. The underlying warrant and any supporting heir certificate or affidavits would help establish the relationship and the exact service history.

An heir-at-law designation does not by itself establish that Christopher never married or that he had no children at any point in his life. The reported identification of Charles as his brother needs to be read alongside the full family and military-land evidence.

The service account associated with this family places Christopher in the First Virginia Cavalry under Captain Robert Yancey, with enlistment references in December 1778 and January 1779. It also mentions a bounty of 400, without a clear currency designation, and a monetary warrant for $57.14 with 5% interest. These details have not been checked against the original military file.

The supplied Historical Register of Virginians in the Revolution index, p. 147, lists Christopher Chewning with an “Inf.” abbreviation. Its source key and the underlying records are needed before that entry and the cavalry account can be reconciled.

4. Robert Chowning

Born 2 March 1740/41 · Baptized 29 March 1741 · Death date unknown

The younger Robert’s birth and baptism are recorded in Christ Church Parish as a son of Robert and Betty Chowning. The family research associates him with Revolutionary military service, but his later life has not been securely reconstructed.

No wife or children have been identified. The previously repeated death before 1777 is not supported by the evidence reviewed for this family.

Distinguishing the RobertsParish evidence, military references, and the father’s support petitions.

The printed parish register, p. 152, supplies the birth and baptism dates. His father, born in 1711/12, is the older Robert associated in the family research with the Caroline support petitions.

The collected account refers to a Robert Chowning in an Auditor’s Account for a Virginia regiment. Campbell’s military list and the supplied revolutionary index also include a Robert Chewning, but the entries available here do not establish the younger Robert’s identity through age or parentage.

The father’s 1777 petition refers to sons in United States service, and the 1780 petition to a son in service. Neither names the son or sons. Those petitions cannot establish a pre-1777 death for the younger Robert.

5. Easter Chowning

Born 25 March 1743 · Baptized 4 April 1743 · Later life unknown

The Christ Church Parish register names this daughter Easter. Later accounts sometimes use Esther. Her birth and baptism are recorded on printed p. 155.

No later marriage, death, or descendant record has been securely identified. The absence of a later record does not establish that she died in infancy.

Return to Menu ↑

Historical Highlights

Parish Life, Religious Dissent & a Family’s Westward Journey

Watercolor illustration of a parish register beside a Tidewater creek

Betty Guthrie and Robert Chowning began their family in Christ Church Parish, Middlesex County, Virginia. The parish register preserves their Christmas Eve marriage and the births and baptisms of four of their five accepted children. Later Caroline County accounts reveal a family touched by religious dissent, wartime hardship, and the difficulties of supporting a household when sons were away in service.

Betty’s appearance in a 1772 account of proceedings against Baptist worship places her within that local religious struggle. Robert’s later petitions describe infirmity and a need for assistance. These records offer glimpses of their lives without supplying everything we would like to know: the sons serving are not named in the relief entries, and neither spouse has a securely established exact death date.

The next generation carried the family story into Kentucky. Charles Chowning’s tax, census, and probate records document property and household changes in Fayette County, while his 1817 will abstract identifies two daughters still in Virginia. Those Kentucky records also count enslaved people whose names and family relationships are not supplied in the entries reviewed here.

Family Timeline

Selected events in Betty and Robert’s family, followed by milestones in their children’s generation. Source notes distinguish register entries, published abstracts, and retained family research.
DateFamily event
1711/12–1719 Two Middlesex County childhoodsRobert, son of Thomas and Sarah Chowning, was born 20 March 1711/12. Betty, daughter of William Guthrie and Lettice Burk, was born 20 March 1718/19 and baptized 19 April 1719 in Christ Church Parish. Source: printed Christ Church Parish register, pp. 87 and 102. Double years preserve the distinction between the old March-based year and modern year numbering.
24 Dec 1735 A Christmas Eve marriageThe parish recorded the marriage by banns of Robert Chowning and Betty Guttery. Betty was sixteen years old. Sources: printed parish register, p. 169; descendant-supplied citation to FamilySearch film 008190054, image 164 of 341.
1736–1743 Their growing familyThe register names Ruth, born 9 October 1736; Charles, born 10 March 1738/39; Robert, born 2 March 1740/41; and Easter, born 25 March 1743. Christopher remains part of the accepted five-child family, although no corresponding parish entry has been located and his birth order is uncertain. Source: printed parish register, pp. 143, 149, 152, and 155. Christopher’s approximate birth around 1740 comes from the collected family outline.
1744 A reported Goochland land transactionRetained family research cites John Page’s purchase of 150 acres in Goochland County from Robert Chowning of Christ Church Parish, Middlesex County. The parish designation is a useful identifying detail, but this citation does not by itself establish that the family moved to Goochland. Source status: retained deed reference; the underlying deed has not been examined for this page.
1771 Charles appears in a religious-dissent caseCollected family research reports that a case involving Charles Chewning and others accused of unauthorized worship was dismissed. This precedes the separate proceeding in which Betty appears the following year. Source status: family research citing Elliott’s history of Caroline County; the original court entry has not been examined here.
1772 Betty refuses to testifyCampbell’s Colonial Caroline describes Betty Chewning and Samuel Daniel as members of John Waller’s congregation. They refused to appear as witnesses against Waller and Henry Goodloe in an unauthorized-worship proceeding and were each fined 350 pounds of tobacco. This account places Betty alive in 1772; it does not establish when she died. Source: Campbell, Colonial Caroline, pp. 222 and 457. These are two passages in the same published history.
11 Dec 1777 Wartime hardship and family assistancePublished and copied court accounts name Robert Chowning or Chewning as infirm and unable to support his family while sons served the United States. The accounts refer to £16 and also provide for William Loyd’s wife and children, but their distribution wording differs. The sons are not named. Sources: Sweeny’s published transcription, p. 105; descendant-supplied Sparacio citation, Order Book Abstracts 1774–1778, p. 77, citing court p. 39. See the relief-account note below.
14 Apr 1780 Another allowance for RobertA descendant-supplied court transcription records an allowance of £60 for Robert Chewning, who could not support himself and had a son in United States service. Robert Gilchrist, Thomas Lomax, John Hoomes, and John Page, or any one of them, were to receive the money for his use. Source: supplied citation to Sparacio, Order Book Abstracts 1778–1781, p. 79. The underlying manuscript page number remains unverified.
11 May 1780 Exemption from county leviesRobert Chewning was exempted from county levies. This was a separate court action from the April assistance allowance. Source: descendant-supplied Sparacio citation, Order Book Abstracts 1778–1781, p. 81, citing Caroline Order Book 1777–1780, p. 228.
Nov–Dec 1785 Robert’s estate enters the court recordA retained 11 November reference identifies Charles as administrator of deceased Robert’s estate in a debt proceeding. A supplied citation dated 8 December records the return and recording of Robert Chewning’s inventory and appraisement. Neither gives his actual death date. Sources: retained 11 November estate/debt citation; Sparacio, Order Book Abstracts 1785–1786, p. 46, citing Order Book 1785–1787, p. 208, for 8 December. The supplied December citation is not a list of the inventory’s contents.
28 Nov 1787 Christopher’s reported military land warrantCollected research identifies warrant 4344 for 100 acres based on Christopher Chowning’s three years of Virginia Continental service, with Charles named as heir at law. The relationship is significant, but the original warrant has not been examined here; heir-at-law wording alone does not prove that Christopher never married or had children. Source status: military bounty-land account retained from the family research. Conflicting service descriptions remain unresolved.
1805–1808 Charles’s household in Fayette County, KentuckyTax entries for 1805 and 1806 list Charles without land. In 1807 and 1808, he appears with 75 acres on David’s Fork, surveyed in Johnson’s name and entered in Bradford’s. The entries record four enslaved people in each year; horse counts rise from four in 1805 to ten in 1808, and a four-wheeled carriage appears in 1807 and 1808. Source: supplied Fayette County tax-list images, 1805–1808. These entries do not identify the enslaved people by name.
1810 A household of eightThe Lexington, Fayette County census entry lists one man and one woman aged forty-five or older, two girls under ten, and four enslaved people. The girls’ identities and relationships to Charles are not established by the census categories alone. Source: supplied 1810 census entry. The county is Fayette, not Lafayette.
21 Mar–May 1817 Charles’s will connects the Virginia and Kentucky familyA typewritten abstract records a will written 21 March and proved in May 1817. It names wife Milly, children, and grandchildren, including Ann Vaughn and Sally Tass as daughters in Virginia. The dates place Charles’s death after the will was written and by its probate in May. Source: supplied Fayette County will abstract, printed p. 21, citing will p. 204. The document reviewed is an abstract, not the handwritten will.
Reading the wartime relief accountsDifferent amounts and wording should remain attached to their sources.

The Sweeny and Sparacio accounts both name Robert, resolving the earlier “Richard” wording in the collected notes. They describe the same December 1777 proceeding, so they should not be counted as independent original records. Sweeny’s transcription describes £16 paid to John Hoomes for family necessities and then says “also the same” for William Loyd’s wife and children. The supplied Sparacio transcription names several men involved in providing support. Until the original wording is compared, the amount should not be assigned exclusively to Robert or automatically divided between the families.

Campbell’s separate allotment tables list £8 in 1777 and £12 in 1780, each with one son in service. The asterisk beside the 1780 entry means second award. These amounts remain distinct from the £16 December account and the £60 allowance in the supplied 14 April 1780 transcription. No currency conversion or other reconciliation has been established.

The petitions document Robert’s need for assistance and sons’ service without naming those sons. They do not establish Betty’s death, Robert’s widowhood, or the military identity of every Robert or Christopher Chowning appearing in other lists.

Robert’s death chronology remains unresolvedAn estate record and a mercantile claim preserve different parts of the story.

The 1785 estate references establish that Robert was then deceased; they do not support an exact death date in 1783. The relief and levy records associated with this Robert place him alive in 1777 and 1780.

A British Mercantile Claims entry published in The Virginia Genealogist, p. 13, citing underlying p. 39, reports a £19.10.8 debt to Bell & Stanfield. It identifies son Charles Chewning, then of Culpeper, as executor and says Robert died in Caroline County “before the war.” That timing conflicts with the later relief records. Its executor wording also differs from the retained administration account.

The claim remains a useful father–son and geographical clue. Its death statement should be preserved as a conflict, without silently changing the wording or deciding that it must concern a different Robert. Betty’s exact death date and burial place also remain unknown.

What these records can—and cannot—tell usNames, relationships, and source types matter.

The parish dates come from the 1897 printed transcription of the Christ Church Parish register. The newly supplied marriage citation points to a register image, but that citation screenshot is not a fresh examination of the underlying manuscript. Spelling varies among Guthrie, Guttery, Chowning, and Chewning; Easter is the daughter’s recorded parish name, with Esther appearing in later family accounts.

The reviewed Campbell passages name Betty Chewning without stating her maiden surname. Her accepted identification in this family is retained, while the published history’s wording is kept distinct from the family reconstruction.

The Kentucky tax and census entries count people whom Charles enslaved but do not name them or establish continuity between the lists. The two young girls in the 1810 household should not be identified as granddaughters without additional evidence. Likewise, the spelling and relationships in Charles’s 1817 abstract should be checked against the original will before treating the abstract as an exact transcription.

Return to Page Menu ↑

Explore the Records

Parish entries establish Betty Guthrie’s parentage, marriage, and four of her children’s births. Court records, military references, and the Kentucky records of the next generation extend the family’s story. The guide below identifies the sources behind this page and the questions that remain open.

The Guthrie DNA Project

Autosomal participation is recorded through Betty Guthrie → Charles Chowning → Robert Chowning, born 1766. This descendant line contributes to the family’s representation in the Guthrie DNA Project.

Within the broader Branch F research, Y-DNA from the tested North Carolina line of William Guthrie and Mary Magdalene matches Guthrie Family Group 1A. The earlier Middlesex County family also shares Christ Church Parish with Branch B. These genetic and geographical connections support studying the branches together while research continues into their precise ancestral links.

Descendant participation through Betty & Robert’s children
Child / LineY-DNABig-YAutosomal
Ruth ChowningN/AN/A—
Charles ChowningThrough son Robert, born 1766N/AN/A✓
Christopher ChowningN/AN/A—
Robert ChowningN/AN/A—
Easter / Esther ChowningN/AN/A—

✓ = recorded project participation. — = no participation currently recorded for that line; it does not establish that the child had no descendants. N/A applies to tracing Betty’s paternal Guthrie line through her children: Betty did not transmit a Y chromosome. A male-line Chowning test follows Chowning paternal ancestry.

Autosomal participation and the broader Branch F Y-DNA match are distinct pieces of evidence. Their interpretation depends on the documented descent paths and the relationships being investigated. Living participants’ identities and individual results are not displayed here.

A Guide to the Family’s Records

Principal sources and what they contribute
Record or CollectionFamily Information
Christ Church Parish register1897 printed transcriptionRobert’s and Betty’s births; their 24 December 1735 marriage; the births and baptisms of Ruth, Charles, Robert, and Easter. Relevant printed pages: 87, 102, 143, 149, 152, 155, and 169.
Thomas Chowning’s will1721 · Middlesex CountyA supplied Hopkins abstract names son Robert and four other children. It supports the accepted father–son relationship; the abstract does not name Thomas’s wife.
Caroline County court accounts1772, 1777, 1780, and 1785Betty’s religious-dissent fine; Robert’s wartime assistance and levy exemption; and estate proceedings after Robert’s death. Published histories and abstracts preserve these accounts, with differences requiring comparison.
British Mercantile ClaimsThe Virginia Genealogist, p. 13A debt account identifies Robert’s son Charles, then in Culpeper. Its statement that Robert died “before the war” conflicts with the later relief records associated with him.
Military and bounty-land referencesChristopher, Charles, and men named RobertService lists and the reported 1787 warrant for Christopher provide leads. The complete files are needed to distinguish namesakes and clarify Charles’s reported status as heir at law.
Fayette County, Kentucky records1805–1817Charles’s tax entries, the 1810 census, and his 1817 will abstract document property, household composition, and relatives in Kentucky and Virginia.
Parish Records & Chowning Family IdentityThe family’s foundation and the importance of separating namesakes.

The printed parish register names Betty as the daughter of William and Lettice Guttery, and Robert as the son of Thomas and Sarah Chowning. The accepted identification of Robert’s mother as Sarah Davis comes from the family research; the parish entry itself gives her first name.

The marriage is recorded as Robert Chowning and Betty Guttery, 24 December 1735, by banns. A descendant supplied a citation to FamilySearch film 008190054, image 164 of 341, supplementing printed register page 169. The supplied item was a citation screenshot; it was not a new inspection of the underlying manuscript.

Thomas Chowning’s will: the supplied copied abstract cites Hopkins, Middlesex County, Virginia 1673–1812 Wills and Inventories and Other Court Papers (1989), p. 61. The will dates are 15 November and 6 December 1721. It names children John, Robert, Mary, Sarah, and Jane; brothers George and John as executors; and Thomas and Elizabeth Kidd as witnesses.

An earlier Robert Chowning: the will dated 4 January 1697/98 names wife Ann and belongs to an earlier generation. It predates the birth of Betty’s husband and must not be attached to his household. An index pointer or matching name alone does not establish identity.

Four children’s parish entries have been located. Christopher remains in the accepted five-child family, with an estimated birth date and uncertain birth order. The register has not supplied evidence for the proposed infancy deaths of Ruth or Easter.

Caroline County Court & Estate SourcesReligious dissent, family assistance, and Robert’s unresolved death chronology.
  • Betty in 1772: Campbell, Colonial Caroline, pp. 222 and 457, describes Betty Chewning and Samuel Daniel refusing to appear as witnesses against John Waller and Henry Goodloe. Each was fined 350 pounds of tobacco. Both supplied pages have been reviewed; they are passages from one published history.
  • 11 December 1777: Sweeny, “Some Colonial and Revolutionary Soldiers as Shown by the Order Books of Caroline County, Virginia,” in Virginia Military Records, p. 105; and Ruth and Sam Sparacio, Caroline County, Virginia Order Book Abstracts 1774–1778 (1994), p. 77, citing court p. 39. The published/copied versions name Robert, describe his infirmity and sons’ service, and differ in their wording about distributing £16 and providing for William Loyd’s family.
  • 14 April 1780: Sparacio, Order Book Abstracts 1778–1781 (1994), p. 79, as cited and transcribed in the supplied descendant notes: a £60 allowance for Robert. The underlying manuscript page number is unverified.
  • 11 May 1780: the same Sparacio volume, p. 81, citing Caroline Order Book 1777–1780, p. 228: Robert’s exemption from county levies. This is separate from the April allowance.
  • Campbell’s allotment tables: Colonial Caroline, pp. 376–378, lists £8 in 1777 and £12 in 1780; the latter is marked as a second award. These amounts remain separately attributed and unreconciled with the other accounts.
  • Robert’s estate: retained research cites Charles as administrator in a debt action on 11 November 1785, with a later proceeding on 11 August 1786. The supplied 8 December 1785 inventory-and-appraisement citation is Sparacio, Order Book Abstracts 1785–1786 (1995), p. 46, citing Order Book 1785–1787, p. 208. The retained FamilySearch locator is film 007644362, image 257. The recording order does not supply the inventory’s contents or an exact death date.

The mercantile-claim conflict: “British Mercantile Claims,” The Virginia Genealogist, printed p. 13, citing underlying p. 39, reports Robert’s £19.10.8 debt to Bell & Stanfield, identifies son Charles in Culpeper as executor, and places Robert’s death “before the war.” The journal volume and year were not shown in the supplied image. The timing conflicts with the later relief records; the executor wording also differs from the retained administration account. Both claims remain visible pending reconciliation.

The supplied histories, abstracts, and copied citations are usable evidence. Further inspection of original orders would refine their wording; it is not necessary to obtain these published excerpts again.

Military Service & Christopher’s Land WarrantKeep service references separate until identity and kinship are established.

The supplied Historical Register of Virginians in the Revolution, p. 147, lists Christopher Chewning and a Robert Chewning of Caroline among other similarly named men. Campbell’s Colonial Caroline, p. 373, also lists Robert and Charles Chewning. These entries do not by themselves state ages, parentage, or enough detail to distinguish every namesake.

Collected family research cites Virginia military land warrant 4344, 28 November 1787, for 100 acres based on Christopher Chowning’s three years of Continental service, with Charles Chowning as heir at law. The warrant and any supporting heir certificate or affidavit would help establish exactly what was claimed and proved.

A retained account associates Christopher with Captain Robert Yancey’s cavalry in December 1778 and January 1779, while the supplied index uses the abbreviation “Inf.” The publication’s key and complete service file are needed to interpret that entry alongside the cavalry account. Likewise, heir-at-law wording alone does not establish Christopher’s exact death date, lifelong bachelorhood, or absence of children.

Charles Chowning’s Kentucky RecordsTax lists, the 1810 household, and the 1817 will abstract.

Fayette County tax lists, 1805–1808: the supplied entries show no land in 1805 and 1806, followed by 75 acres on David’s Fork in 1807 and 1808. They record four enslaved people each year, along with horses and, in 1807 and 1808, a four-wheeled carriage. The entries do not name the enslaved people or establish their relationships.

1810 census: the Lexington, Fayette County household includes a man and woman aged forty-five or older, two girls under ten, and four enslaved people. The girls’ identities remain unestablished. Fayette is the relevant county name.

Will written 21 March 1817; proved May 1817: the supplied image is a typewritten abstract, printed p. 21, citing will p. 204. It names wife Milly; children Charles, Robert, Milly Tap, and Betsey Kemper; Lucy Stephens’s children Milly, Lucinda, Mahaly, and Thursey; and Ann Vaughn and Sally Tass as daughters in Virginia. Executors are George Berry and Lewis Bryant; witnesses are James Daley and Thomas Nutall.

The abstract supplies a useful family framework and places Charles’s death after the will was written and by its probate in May. The original will would help confirm spellings, relationships, and the complete bequests, including any people or property omitted from the abstract.

Further Reading & Research ConnectionsPublished family studies and the working research tree.

Thomas Daniel Knight, “Chownings of Middlesex, Lancaster and Beyond: A Study of Family and Migration,” Northern Neck of Virginia Historical Magazine, December 2006, volume LVI, pp. 6677–6697. The supplied citation specifically points to p. 6677. The article text has not been reviewed for this page, so its conclusions are not represented here.

Red River Settlers, supplied p. 9: this secondary compilation contains tentative language and a proposed parentage for Robert that differs from the Christ Church Parish entry. Its Tennessee Bible material has not been connected to Betty and Robert’s household by a demonstrated descent chain.

The Guthrie Research Tree profile for Betty brings the family’s records and working notes together. See the Branch F Family Hub for the wider family and its connections within GFG1A.

Most Wanted DocumentsRecords that could answer the remaining family questions.
  • Robert’s administration papers and full estate inventory. An appointment or bond preceding the November 1785 debt action, the underlying inventory, and any distribution could identify heirs and narrow his death interval.
  • The original mercantile claim and its full report context. A dated report and surrounding documentation could help resolve the “before the war” statement and the description of Charles as executor.
  • Christopher’s warrant and supporting heir papers. Warrant 4344 of 28 November 1787, with any affidavits or certificates, could clarify his service, death, and Charles’s relationship to him.
  • Charles’s complete 1817 will and probate endorsement. The existing abstract is available; the handwritten record could confirm the married surnames, grandchildren, and full bequests.
  • Betty’s later-life, death, or burial record. The 1772 religious-dissent account establishes her presence that year. A later deed, church entry, estate reference, or family record could extend her chronology.
  • Records following Ruth, Robert, and Easter into adulthood. Marriages, deeds, probate, or family papers may clarify their later lives and distinguish them from similarly named people.
  • Original Caroline court orders behind the supplied accounts. The 1772 proceeding, 11 December 1777 assistance order, and separate April and May 1780 actions could settle exact wording and the relief-payment discrepancies.

The Campbell passages, descendant-supplied court citations, and Charles’s will abstract have already been incorporated. These requests concern additional evidence and original-record comparisons.

Help This Family’s Story Grow

Tidewater letters and an heirloom quilt, a family-history illustration

A parish entry preserves a birth; a court petition reveals a difficult season; a will connects relatives separated by hundreds of miles. Together, these records give Betty Guthrie and Robert Chowning’s family a place in the history of Virginia and Kentucky. Family papers may yet restore more names, relationships, and personal details.

If you descend from this family or have a Bible entry, letter, deed, probate record, or other evidence to add, share your finding with Guthrie Genealogy. Please include the source and explain how the people named connect to the family.

Descendants are welcome to contribute documented lineages and discuss relevant autosomal comparisons. DNA testing is not required to help tell this story.

Researched and curated by Ann Guthrie · Guthrie Genealogy