Criminal Trials in Scotland

Guthrie Genealogy · Special Collections · Scotland

Criminal Trials in Scotland

Guthrie References in Robert Pitcairn’s High Court of Justiciary Collections · 1488–1624

Robert Pitcairn’s great collection of Scottish criminal records preserves proceedings for treason, slaughter, theft, feud, rebellion, bigamy and other offences, together with assize lists, legal officers, sureties and extensive editorial notes. For Guthrie research it is unusually rich: the records place members of the family on nearly every side of the court—as judges, jurors, counsel, cautioners, victims, accused persons, pursuers and royal household servants.

The same body of material appeared in two closely related publication formats. To avoid presenting the same Guthrie record twice, this page uses the completed 1833 Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland arrangement—three volumes in seven parts—as the canonical survey.

Record Coverage1488–1624
Canonical Edition3 volumes · 7 parts
Indexed References31 Guthrie-related entries
EditorRobert Pitcairn
Survey StatusComplete. Seven-part edition reviewed.
Publication note: Pitcairn first issued the material in ten successive parts between 1829 and 1833 as Criminal Trials and Other Proceedings before the High Court of Justiciary in Scotland. The completed work was then reissued in 1833 as Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, arranged in three volumes and seven parts. Because the underlying Justiciary material is essentially the same, the earlier ten-part issue is treated here as an alternate publication form rather than as a second set of Guthrie evidence.

Master Index · Guthrie References

The index below contains one row for each Guthrie-related reference in the seven-part canonical survey. Entry opens the expanded evidence card; Source opens the digitized part containing the record.

Part / PageDateGuthrie(s)RoleAccess
Volume I · Part 1
p. 72
14 December 1510 (court sitting); 18 December 1510 (trial) Alexander Guthrie de eodem, miles Justiciar Depute
Volume I · Part 1
p. 143
5 August (16 James V – contextually 1529) James Guthry, Captain of the Castle of Crechtoune Accused (amerciated)
Volume I · Part 1
p. 254
10 January 1539/40 Johne Guthre of Balnabrech Recipient of respite
Volume I · Part 1
p. 313
28 James V (contextually 1540–41 period of the Appendix lists) Johnne Guthre Yeoman in the King’s Chamber
Volume I · Part 2
p. 16
1570 (same day as the preceding entry on the page) Archibald Guthre; Alexander Guthre de Kincoldrum Bailie (replegiation); Pledge/surety
Volume I · Part 2
p. 29
28 December 1571 (5 James VI) Alexander Guthre, burgess of Edinburgh Accused (delated)
Volume I · Part 2
p. 74
29 June 1577 (10 James VI) Alexander Guthre of that Ilk; David Guthre, fiar of Kincaldrum; Henrye Guthere of Colestoune Assize (jury) members
Volume I · Part 2
p. 77
26 February 1577/78 (11 James VI) Mr Alexander Guthre Prelocutor (defence counsel)
Volume I · Part 2
p. 343
13 May 1549 Mr Hugh Guthre Victim
Volume I · Part 2
p. 408
12 March 1560/61 (with follow-up on 30 April) Alexander Guthrie in Elgyne Accused (delated)
Volume I · Part 2
p. 411
1 December 1561 Thomas Guthre of Kynbach Protester
Volume I · Part 2
p. 433
7 July 1563 Mr Hew Guthrie (victim); Alexander Guthrie, Messenger Victim; Co-accused finding caution
Volume I · Part 2
p. 442
6–23 June 1564 (with related Act of 15 March 1563/64) Alexander Guthrie / Guthre, Commoun Scribe of Edinburgh Accused magistrate; Town Clerk; record-keeper
Volume I · Part 3
p. 258
21 May 1591 (at Edinburgh) Alexander Guthrie, fiar (and apparent) of Kincaldrum Cautioner / surety
Volume I · Part 3
p. 352
23 December 1595 (charges issued); appearance appointed for 8 February (for Guthrie of that Ilk) Guthrie of that Ilk Party under deadly feud
Volume I · Part 3
p. 372
8 June 1596 (with royal warrant dated 4 June 1596) Alexander Guthre of that Ilk (deceased); Isobel Wod, Lady Guthre (relict); James Guthre of Gagye; David Guthre & Gabriell Guthre (sons) Victim; Pursuers
Volume II · Part 1
p. 74
30–31 January 1599 (warrant dated 30 January 1598) Mr Dauid Guthre Prelocutor (counsel for pursuer)
Volume II · Part 1
p. 101
14–18 December 1599 (33 James VI) Alexander Guthrie, elder of Kincaldrum; David Guthrie, younger of Kincaldrum; Gedeon Guthrie in Lytill Lowre; Williame Guthre of Langlandis of Guthrie; Alexander Guthrie, fiar of that Ilk; James Guthrie (deceased, son of Alexander of that Ilk) Accused (five Guthries); Victim
Volume II · Part 1
p. 103
8 January 1600 (33 James VI) Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk (deceased); Alexander Guthrie, younger of that Ilk Victim; Pursuer
Volume II · Part 1
p. 130
15 July 1600 (with royal warrant dated 28 June 1600) Patrik Guthre of Pitmowes Initially accused; deleted from summons by royal warrant
Volume II · Part 2
p. 277
June 1609 (forfeiture proceedings); related events of 1600 (Gowrie Conspiracy) Bishop Guthrie Editorial reference only
Volume II · Part 2
p. 428
12 January 1604 Robert Guthrie, servant to Mr Alexander Gibson Victim
Volume II · Part 2
p. 528
26 June 1607 Williame Guthrie of Ravensbie Accused (delated)
Volume II · Part 2
p. 529
8 July 1607 George Guthrie, servant to the late Alexander, Lord Spynie Servant producing letters for the pursuers
Volume III · Part 1
p. 61
17 June 1605 (the incident); the trial material is from 1609 William Guthrie (servant / man of the young Laird of Pittarrow) Victim
Volume III · Part 1
p. 77
29 December 1610 Williame Guthrie of Ravensbie; Alexander Guthrie, fiar of that Ilk Accused; Cautioner
Volume III · Part 1
p. 80
25 July 1610 Williame Guthrie of Ravensbie (lawful son to the late Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk); the Laird of Guthrie; Alexander Guthrie, fiar of that Ilk Accused; Prelocutor; Cautioner
Volume III · Part 1
p. 196
Editorial note (referring to events of 1661) Mr James Guthrie (the Covenanter minister) Editorial anecdote only
Volume III · Part 2
p. 428
14 March 1617 (sentence against John Guthrie follows immediately) Johnne Guthrie, alias callit Williame Laird Accused & convicted
Volume III · Part 2
p. 437
18 March 1617 Patrik Guthrie of Kinblakmonth Assizer (juror)
Volume III · Part 2
p. 585
9 January 1621 (Kirk Session of Perth record, cited in editorial appendix) Mr John Guthry, Minister Disbursing agent for Kirk Session

Volume I · Part 1

1488–1542
Reviewed — 4 Guthrie references found
Alexander Guthrie de eodem, miles
Volume I · Part 1 · page 72
Date14 December 1510 (court sitting); 18 December 1510 (trial)
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Alexander Guthrie de eodem, miles (Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk, knight)
RoleJusticiar Depute presiding over the Justice Ayre of Peebles in place of Andrew, Lord Gray.
Document FocusRecord of a sitting of the Justice Ayre of Peebles and the subsequent trial of George Tuedy for the slaughter of William Young.
Original LanguageLatin (court heading) and Scots/English (narrative)
Other Primary Parties
  • Andrew, Lord Gray (principal Justiciar, for whom Guthrie acts as depute)
  • George Tuedy (accused)
  • William Young (the deceased, described as a common thief)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
Court of the Justice Ayre of Peebles, held on Saturday, 14 December 1510, before Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk, knight, Justiciar Depute of Andrew, Lord Gray, etc.

Slaughter of a Common Thief. 18 December (Thursday, the fifth day of the Ayre). — George Tuedy delated of art and part of the Slaughter of William Young; and being accused thereof, the foresaid Justice depute, with the counsel and advice of the Lords then sitting as Assessors to him, because it clearly appeared that the said William had been and was a common Thief, as was proved by sundry of the King’s Letters under his signet and subscription-manual for taking the said William, etc., and that he had been slain in the commission of Theft and crimes: Therefore the said George was acquitted of the crime of the foresaid Slaughter; and command was given to the Justice Clerk that the said George should never thereafter be taken or indicted for the same.

Why This Record Matters

  • Records Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk, styled knight, acting as Justiciar Depute in the Justice Ayre of Peebles in December 1510.
  • Demonstrates his high status and involvement in the administration of royal justice in the early 16th century.
  • Consistent with other contemporary appearances of Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk in official capacities.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume I · Part 1, p. 72.
Digital access: Volume I · Part 1 · 1488–1542
James Guthry, Captain of the Castle of Crechtoune
Volume I · Part 1 · page 143
Date5 August (16 James V – contextually 1529)
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • James Guthry, Captain of the Castle of Crechtoune (James Guthrie, Captain of Crichton Castle)
RoleAccused (amerciated for failing to appear / underlying the law) as Captain of Crichton Castle, for art and part in the reiving of 100 sheep.
Document FocusRecord of an amercement (fine) and assignment of a new term in a case of stouthreif (violent theft) and oppression.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • William Borthwick of Crukstoune (the injured party)
  • John Lord Hay of Yester (owner of the lands where the sheep were grazing)
  • Andrew Purves and ten others (found security to appear for the same crime)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
5 August. — James Guthry, Captain of the Castle of Crechtoune, amerciated for not underlying the law for art and part of the Stouthreif and Oppression done to William Borthwick of Crukstoune, in ‘reiving’ from his servant and shepherd of 100 sheep, being at the grazings upon the lands belonging to John Lord Hay of Yester. New term assigned, under the pain of rebellion, etc. — Andrew Purves and ten others found security to appear at the Justice-aire of Edinburgh, to answer for the same crime.

Why This Record Matters

  • Records James Guthrie as Captain of Crichton Castle in 1529.
  • Places him in a military/administrative role connected with a significant Border/Lothian stronghold and involved in a case of violent theft of livestock.
  • Provides an early 16th-century appearance of a Guthrie holding an official castle captaincy.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume I · Part 1, p. 143.
Digital access: Volume I · Part 1 · 1488–1542
Johne Guthre of Balnabrech
Volume I · Part 1 · page 254
Date10 January 1539/40
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Johne Guthre of Balnabrech (John Guthrie of Balnabrech)
RoleRecipient of a 19-year respite for the crime of mutilation.
Document FocusRecord of a royal respite (temporary protection from prosecution) granted in the Appendix of the Criminal Trials.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • Patrick Annand (the deceased / injured party, described as “vmqle” – the late)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
10 January. — Respite to John Guthrie of Balnabrech for the Mutilation of the late Patrick Annand, etc.: For 19 years.

Why This Record Matters

  • Records John Guthrie of Balnabrech receiving a 19-year respite in January 1539/40 for the mutilation of Patrick Annand.
  • Places a member of the Balnabrech branch of the family in a serious criminal matter in the late 1530s.
  • Consistent with other mid-16th-century appearances of Guthries associated with Balnabrech / Balnabreche lands.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume I · Part 1, p. 254.
Digital access: Volume I · Part 1 · 1488–1542
Johnne Guthre
Volume I · Part 1 · page 313
Date28 James V (contextually 1540–41 period of the Appendix lists)
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Johnne Guthre (John Guthrie)
RoleYeoman in the King’s Chamber (listed among those receiving a uniform payment).
Document FocusEntry in a list of payments or rewards made to members of the royal household and officers.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • Various members of the royal household (William Baird, James Wod, Normond Lesley, Patrik Kircaldy, James Watsoune, Johnne Tennent, and others listed in the same item)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
Item, to William Baird, James Wod, Ushers of the Outer-Chamber-Door; Normond Lesley, Patrik Kircaldy, Johnne Guthre, and James Watsoune, yeomen in the King’s Chamber; Johnne Tennent, yeoman in the Wardrobe; … ilkane of thir personis, xiiij s. vj d., summa …

Why This Record Matters

  • Records a John Guthrie serving as a yeoman in the King’s Chamber during the reign of James V.
  • Places a member of the family in a personal, household role close to the monarch in the early 1540s.
  • Distinct from the landed “of Balnabrech” or “of that Ilk” appearances; this is a court/household context.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume I · Part 1, p. 313.
Digital access: Volume I · Part 1 · 1488–1542

Volume I · Part 2

1542–1584
Reviewed — 9 Guthrie references found
Archibald Guthre; Alexander Guthre de Kincoldrum
Volume I · Part 2 · page 16
Date1570 (same day as the preceding entry on the page)
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Archibald Guthre (Archibald Guthrie), bailie for the Commendator of Arbroath
  • Alexander Guthre de Kincoldrum (Alexander Guthrie of Kincaldrum)
Role
  • Archibald Guthrie acted as bailie for George, Commendator of the Monastery of Arbroath, and replegiated the accused to the privilege and jurisdiction of the Regality of Arbroath.
  • Alexander Guthrie of Kincaldrum became surety (pledge) for the entry of the accused to underlie the law for the said crime.
Document FocusReplegiation of four men accused of the invasion and cruel wounding of William Sibbald to the Regality of Arbroath, with sureties found for their appearance.
Original LanguageLatin (with Scots verdict)
Other Primary Parties
  • Robertus Rait, Robertus Wishart, Joannes Richie, and Joannes Fettes (the accused)
  • Willelmus Sibbald (the injured party, brother of David Sibbald of Cair)
  • George, Commendator of the Monastery of Arbroath
  • Willelmus Rait de Halgrene (additional pledge for the administration of justice)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
On the same day as above. Robert Rait, Robert Wishart, John Richie and John Fettes were delated of art and part of the invasion of William Sibbald, brother of David Sibbald of Cair, for his wounding and the cruel wounding of the same in his head, to the great effusion of his blood, by the discharge of a small firearm (the bent pistol), and leaving him in danger of death, committed on the last day of April last at the hill called St Gilbert’s-hill, as is more fully contained in the royal letters directed thereupon.

By Archibald Guthrie, bailie in this part for George, Commendator of the Monastery of Arbroath, by virtue of the commission of the same, they were replegiated to the privilege and jurisdiction of his Regality, as if dwelling within the bounds of the same; assigning the third day of the next ayre of the said Regality, or elsewhere upon fifteen days’ premonition, for their appearance to underlie the law for the said crime.

Pledge: Alexander Guthrie of Kincaldrum, for their entry to underlie the law for the said crime; and the foresaid William Rait of Halgrene became pledge for the administration of justice in the premises, according to the form of law.

Why This Record Matters

  • Records Archibald Guthrie acting as bailie for the Commendator of Arbroath in 1570.
  • Records Alexander Guthrie of Kincaldrum acting as surety in the same proceedings.
  • Continues the documented involvement of both the Kincaldrum branch and other Guthries in legal and jurisdictional matters in Angus.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume I · Part 2, p. 16.
Digital access: Volume I · Part 2 · 1542–1584
Alexander Guthre, burgess of Edinburgh
Volume I · Part 2 · page 29
Date28 December 1571 (5 James VI)
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Alexander Guthre, burges of Edinburgh (Alexander Guthrie, burgess of Edinburgh)
RoleAccused (delated) of assisting the rebels who were holding the town of Edinburgh against the King.
Document FocusRecord of a delation for treason (assisting the rebels in withholding the town of Edinburgh) and the finding of sureties for the accused’s appearance.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • Robert Rynd and Johanne Fergusoune, burgesses of Edinburgh (pledges / sureties)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
28 December. — Alexander Guthre, burgess of Edinburgh. Delated of the assistance made and given by him to the rebels, withholders of the town, in fortifying, strengthening and detaining thereof against our sovereign lord and his authority. — Pledges: Robert Rynd and John Fergusoune, burgesses of Edinburgh, jointly and severally. To the last day of January next to come; and thereafter continued to the penult day of August.

Why This Record Matters

  • Records Alexander Guthrie, burgess of Edinburgh, charged in December 1571 with assisting the rebels who held Edinburgh against the young King James VI (during the Marian civil war period).
  • Provides a clear political/criminal appearance of an Edinburgh Guthrie during the turbulent early years of James VI’s minority.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume I · Part 2, p. 29.
Digital access: Volume I · Part 2 · 1542–1584
Alexander Guthre of that Ilk; David Guthre, fiar of Kincaldrum; Henrye Guthere of Colestoune
Volume I · Part 2 · page 74
Date29 June 1577 (10 James VI)
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Alexander Guthre of that Ilk (Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk)
  • David Guthre, fiar of Kincaldrum (David Guthrie, fiar of Kincaldrum)
  • Henrye Guthere of Colestoune (Henry Guthrie of Colestoun)
RoleAll three served as members of the Assize (jury) in the trial of Sir David Grahame of Fintry and his brothers.
Document FocusTrial of Sir David Grahame of Fintry and his brothers for oppression (the taking of John Pegot) and for intercommuning with the rebel Robert Betoune of Westhall.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • Sir David Grahame of Fintry, knight, and his brothers Walter and James Grahame (the accused)
  • Johnne Pegot (the person alleged to have been taken)
  • Robert Belouch / Betoune of Westhall (the rebel with whom they were accused of intercommuning)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
(Assize list extract)

Assize: Gilbert Ogilbye of that Ilk, George Gray of Scheilhill, David Rossie of that Ilk, Thomas Fotheringhame of Powrie, George Drummond of the Blair, David Lindesay of Edzell, Alexander Guthre of that Ilk, Robert Durhame of the Grange, David Guthre, fiar of Kincaldrum, George Haliburtoune of Petcure, Henrye Guthere of Colestoune, The Laird of Auchinlek, Robert Erskyn, fiar of Dun, George Somer of Balzordie, Alexander Lauder of Winmoquhe.

Why This Record Matters

  • Records three members of the Guthrie family serving together on the same assize in 1577: – Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk – David Guthrie, fiar of Kincaldrum – Henry Guthrie of Colestoun
  • Demonstrates the continued local standing and involvement of both the principal Guthrie of that Ilk line and the Kincaldrum branch in the administration of justice in the 1570s.

Terms & Practices

  • Assisa / Assize: The jury of assize in a criminal trial before the Justice Court or Justice Ayre.
  • Fiar: The person holding the fee (heritable right) of a property, as opposed to a liferenter.
  • Intercommuning with rebels: The crime of communicating, assisting, or harbouring persons who had been declared rebels (often under process of horn).
  • Replegiation: The process by which a lord of regality could reclaim jurisdiction over a person residing within his bounds.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume I · Part 2, p. 74.
Digital access: Volume I · Part 2 · 1542–1584
Mr Alexander Guthre
Volume I · Part 2 · page 77
Date26 February 1577/78 (11 James VI)
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Mr Alexander Guthre (Master Alexander Guthrie)
RolePrelocutor (counsel) in defence for the accused in a slaughter trial.
Document FocusTrial of William Thrisle (skipper of the ship Nightingale) and several mariners for the cruel slaughter of Robert Watson in Leith, committed in October 1577.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • Williame Thrisle in Dundie, skipper of the Nychtingall, and others (the accused)
  • Robert Watsoun in Leyth (the deceased)
  • Elizabeth Andersoun, relict of the deceased, and the three fatherless children (pursuers)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
(Relevant extract)

Prelocutors in defence: The Constable of Dundee, Mr Johnne Scharp, The Laird Eggell, Mr Alexander Guthre, The Master of Glammis, Mr Richard Strang.

Verdict: On the margin of the Record, ‘Omnes Acquit, de omnibus infra script.’ (All acquitted of all the crimes written below.)

Why This Record Matters

  • Records Master Alexander Guthrie acting as prelocutor (defence counsel) in a criminal trial before the Justice Court in 1578.
  • The designation “Mr” indicates he was a university graduate, consistent with other educated members of the family appearing in legal roles in this period.

Terms & Practices

  • Prelocutor / Preloquitour: Counsel or advocate speaking on behalf of a party (here, for the defence).
  • Dilatio / Delation: Formal accusation or indictment.
  • Assize verdict recorded in Latin on the margin: A common practice in the Books of Adjournal.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume I · Part 2, p. 77.
Digital access: Volume I · Part 2 · 1542–1584
Mr Hugh Guthre
Volume I · Part 2 · page 343
Date13 May 1549
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Mr Hugh Guthre (Master Hugh Guthrie)
RoleVictim of the alleged cruel slaughter.
Document FocusRecord of a delation (accusation) for slaughter, with the accused being excused as sick and finding surety to appear at the next Justice Ayre of Forfar.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • James Wod of Bonyngtoune (accused of art and part in the slaughter)
  • Richard Maitland of Lethingtoune (surety)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
13 May. — James Wod of Bonyngtoune delated of art and part of the cruel Slaughter of Mr Hugh Guthre. — Proved to be sick. Richard Maitland of Lethingtoune became surety for his entry at the next Aire of Forfar.

Why This Record Matters

  • Records the death by violence of Master Hugh Guthrie in or before May 1549.
  • The use of “Mr” (Master) indicates he was a university graduate or cleric.
  • The case was to be heard at the Justice Ayre of Forfar, placing the event in that sheriffdom.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume I · Part 2, p. 343.
Digital access: Volume I · Part 2 · 1542–1584
Alexander Guthrie in Elgyne
Volume I · Part 2 · page 408
Date12 March 1560/61 (with follow-up on 30 April)
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Alexander Guthrie in Elgyne (Alexander Guthrie in Elgin), burgess of Elgin
RoleAccused (delated) of art and part in an armed convocation and the wounding of Lady Pittendreich’s servants. Later amerciated for non-appearance and denounced rebel.
Document FocusRecord of a delation for illegal convocation of the lieges and the wounding of Lady Pittendreich’s servants, with subsequent proceedings for non-appearance.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • James Hay of Mayne and George Monro of Dalcarthy (fellow accused)
  • Elizabeth Douglas, Lady of Pittendreich (whose tenants and servants were attacked)
  • Alexander Robertsone in Pittendreich and Alexander Henry in Brounsyde (the wounded parties)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
12 March 1560/61. — James Hay of Mayne, George Monro of Dalcarthy, Alexander Guthrie in Elgin, and seven other burgesses of Elgin, delated for Convocation of our sovereign lady’s lieges, to the number of eight score persons or thereby, on the 8th day of January last bypast, armed in fear of war, contrary to the Acts of Parliament, and setting upon Alexander Robertsone in Pittendreich, etc., tenants and servants to Elizabeth Douglas, Lady of Pittendreich, and hurting and wounding them in diverse parts of their bodies, to the great effusion of their blood, and left the said Alexander Robertsone and Alexander Henry (in Brounsyde) lying for dead, upon old feud and forethought felony, etc.

Guthrie and two others [ordered] to answer at the next ayre of Elgin and Forres. — (30 April) Amerciated for non-appearance, (and denounced rebels).

Why This Record Matters

  • Records Alexander Guthrie, burgess of Elgin, involved in a serious case of armed convocation and wounding in early 1561.
  • Shows a Guthrie presence in Elgin (Moray) and participation in local feuding.
  • He failed to appear at the subsequent Justice Ayre and was denounced rebel.

Terms & Practices

  • Convocation of the lieges: The illegal gathering of armed men, contrary to Acts of Parliament.
  • Forethought felony: Premeditated crime (as opposed to hot-blooded action).
  • Amerciated for non-appearance: Fined for failing to appear when summoned.
  • Denounced rebel: Formally declared rebel after non-appearance (process of horn).
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume I · Part 2, p. 408.
Digital access: Volume I · Part 2 · 1542–1584
Thomas Guthre of Kynbach
Volume I · Part 2 · page 411
Date1 December 1561
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Thomas Guthre of Kynbach (Thomas Guthrie of Kinbach / Kynbach)
RoleProtester – claimed damage and skaith because he had been charged by Letters to underlie the law, yet no party appeared to pursue him.
Document FocusRecord of proceedings in the case of the slaughter of Lady Ullesthaven, including a protest by Thomas Guthrie of Kynbach.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • James Schoriswod (accused of the slaughter of Lady Ullesthaven)
  • Helene Stirling, Lady Ulleshevene (the deceased)
  • James Stratoune and James Lychtoun, Parson of Dunloppy (who offered to pursue the case)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
Thomas Guthre of Kynbach protested for his damage and skaith sustained by him, that insofar as he was charged by the Letters to underlie the law, and that no party compeared to pursue him, that he might recover the same, either upon the officer executor of the Letters or the party; and thereupon asked instruments.

Why This Record Matters

  • Records Thomas Guthrie of Kynbach in 1561 as a person who had been cited to appear in a serious criminal case (the slaughter of Lady Ullesthaven) but against whom no pursuer appeared.
  • Provides a mid-16th-century appearance of a Guthrie holding the designation “of Kynbach.”
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume I · Part 2, p. 411.
Digital access: Volume I · Part 2 · 1542–1584
Mr Hew Guthrie (victim); Alexander Guthrie, Messenger
Volume I · Part 2 · page 433
Date7 July 1563
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Mr Hew Guthrie (Master Hugh Guthrie) – the deceased
  • Alexander Guthrie, Messenger
Role
  • Mr Hew Guthrie is the victim of the slaughter (committed in February 1548 under the Castle wall of Brechin).
  • Alexander Guthrie, Messenger, is one of the three men finding caution to answer for art and part in that slaughter.
Document FocusRecord of caution being found by James Wod of Bonyngtoune, his brother William, and Alexander Guthrie, Messenger, to appear at the next Justice Ayre of Forfar to answer for the slaughter of Master Hugh Guthrie.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • James Wod of Bonyngtoune and William his brother (co-accused)
  • Lord Ruthven (cautioner)
  • Cristeane Rettray and William Tyrie (her spouse) – pursuers (who passed from the pursuit of the Laird at this time)
  • Mr John Hepburne in Brechin and John Low (additional sureties for assythment)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
7 July. — James Wod of Bonyngtoune, William his brother, and Alexander Guthrie, Messenger, found Lord Ruthven cautioner for their entry at the next Aire of Forfar, to underlie the law for ‘arte and parte of the Slaughter of the late Mr Hew Guthrie, under the Castell-wall of Brechin, in the month of February 1548 years; upon old feud, set purpose, provision, and forethought felony.’

Cristeane Rettray and William Tyrie, ‘now her spouse,’ pursuers, ‘pass from the pursuit of the Laird at this time’; whereupon the Laird took instruments.

The said William Wod ‘asked instruments that he required the Laird, his brother, to read the special Remission granted to him and the said William and others for the said Slaughter, to the effect that he might use the same.’ The said Laird ‘answered that he had already produced a Remission sufficient for the said William for the said crime.’

Mr John Hepburne in Brechin and John Low became sureties along with the said William for Assythment of party.

Why This Record Matters

  • Confirms the earlier 1549 reference: Master Hugh Guthrie was killed under the Castle wall of Brechin in February 1548.
  • Shows the case still active in 1563, with James Wod of Bonyngtoune and others (including a messenger named Alexander Guthrie) still under obligation to answer for it.
  • Links the death of Master Hugh Guthrie to a long-running feud involving the Woods of Bonnyton.

Terms & Practices

  • Assythment: Compensation paid to the kin of a slain person as part of settling a blood feud.
  • Forethought felony: Premeditated killing.
  • Remission: Royal pardon or letter of remission for a crime.
  • Cautioner / Surety: Person who becomes bound for the appearance of the accused or for payment of assythment.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume I · Part 2, p. 433.
Digital access: Volume I · Part 2 · 1542–1584
Alexander Guthrie / Guthre, Commoun Scribe of Edinburgh
Volume I · Part 2 · page 442
Date6–23 June 1564 (with related Act of 15 March 1563/64)
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Alexander Guthrie / Guthre / Guthré, Commoun Scribe (Town Clerk) of Edinburgh
Role
  • One of the Magistrates / Councillors of Edinburgh charged with art and part in releasing William Patersoune from the Tolbooth.
  • Common Scribe (Town Clerk) of Edinburgh; ordered to produce the Common Book containing the relevant Acts.
  • Subscriber of an Act dated 15 March 1563 concerning the release.
Document FocusCriminal proceedings against the Magistrates and Council of Edinburgh for releasing William Patersoune from the Tolbooth after he had mortally wounded Nicoll Ȝoung. The case involves arguments about jurisdiction, whether the release constituted a crime, and the production of the town’s official records.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • Maister Johne Spens, Dauid Symmer, Mr Robert Glen (Bailies)
  • Eduard Houpe, James Barroune, Alexander Park (Treasurer), and other Councillors
  • William Patersoune (the prisoner who was released)
  • Nicoll Ȝoung (the injured party who later died of his wounds)
  • The Queen’s Advocates (pursuers)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
6 June 1564. — Master John Spens, David Symmer, Mr Robert Glen (Bailies), together with other members of the Council, and Alexander Guthrie (Common Scribe / Town Clerk of Edinburgh), were charged with art and part in setting William Patersoune, burgess of Edinburgh, at liberty from the Tolbooth after he had recently wounded the late Nicoll Young (who was lying in danger of death). Young died of the injury within twenty-four hours of Patersoune’s release.

The Queen’s Advocates required Alexander Guthrie, Common Scribe of Edinburgh, in the Queen’s name, to produce immediately the Common Book in which the Acts concerning the release of William Patersoune were recorded.

An Act dated 15 March 1563, produced by the Advocate and subscribed by Alexander Guthrie, was also brought into the proceedings.

Why This Record Matters

  • Records Alexander Guthrie as Common Scribe (Town Clerk) of Edinburgh in 1563–64.
  • Shows him both as one of the officials charged in a high-profile case and as the keeper of the burgh’s official records that were demanded in court.
  • Provides a clear mid-16th-century appearance of a Guthrie holding a senior administrative office in the capital.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume I · Part 2, p. 442.
Digital access: Volume I · Part 2 · 1542–1584

Volume I · Part 3

1584–1596
Reviewed — 3 Guthrie references found
Alexander Guthrie, fiar (and apparent) of Kincaldrum
Volume I · Part 3 · page 258
Date21 May 1591 (at Edinburgh)
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Alexander Guthrie, fiar (and apparent) of Kincaldrum
RoleCautioner and surety for William Douglas, Master of Angus (eldest lawful son of William, Earl of Angus). He bound himself that the Master of Angus would go to Dundee within four days, remain there until he sailed out of the realm within forty days, and not return without the King’s licence, under a penalty of ten thousand pounds.
Document FocusRecord of caution found by Alexander Guthrie of Kincaldrum for the temporary exile of the Master of Angus.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • William Douglas, Master of Angus (the person for whom caution was found)
  • William, Earl of Angus (his father)
  • William, Maister of Angus and David Grahame of Fintrie (the preceding entry on the same page, who had been ordered to lose their liferents for declining the true religion)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
21 May, at Edinburgh. — Alexander Guthrie, fiar of Kincaldrum, became acted and obliged as cautioner and surety to William Douglas (Master of Angus), eldest lawful son to William, Earl of Angus, that he shall repair to the town of Dundee within the space of four days after the date hereof, and therein remain until he make sail and depart forth of this realm within the space of forty days thereafter: And that he shall not return again within the same without his Majesty’s licence obtained to that effect, under the pain of ten thousand pounds.

(Subscribed) Alexander Guthrie, apparent of Kincaldrum.

Why This Record Matters

  • Records Alexander Guthrie as both fiar and apparent of Kincaldrum in May 1591.
  • Shows him acting as a high-value surety (£10,000) for the Master of Angus in a politically sensitive matter involving religious non-conformity and temporary banishment.
  • Continues the documented prominence of the Kincaldrum branch in national affairs in the early 1590s.

Terms & Practices

  • Fiar / Fear: Holder of the fee (heritable right) of the lands.
  • Apparent / Appeirand: The heir-apparent.
  • Cautioner / Surety: Person who becomes bound under a monetary penalty for another’s performance of an obligation (here, exile and non-return).
  • Acted and obliged: Formally entered in the court books as bound.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume I · Part 3, p. 258.
Digital access: Volume I · Part 3 · 1584–1596
Guthrie of that Ilk
Volume I · Part 3 · page 352
Date23 December 1595 (charges issued); appearance appointed for 8 February (for Guthrie of that Ilk)
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Guthrie of that Ilk
RoleOne of the persons charged to appear before the King and Council at Holyroodhouse concerning a deadly feud, ordered to keep their lodgings after arrival until specially sent for.
Document FocusRoyal charge against persons involved in deadly feuds, requiring them to appear before the King and Council so that order might be taken for removing the feuds.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • David, Earl of Crawford (listed with Guthrie of that Ilk for the same appearance date)
  • Numerous other nobles and lairds charged on various dates (Master of Eglintoun, Earl of Glencairn, Earl of Montrose, etc.)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
(Relevant extract)

23 December. — ‘Charge against persons under deadly feud,’ to appear before the King and Council ‘at Haliruidhous;’ and ‘that they keep their lodgings after their coming, until they be specially sent for,’ etc.

… David, Earl of Crawford, and . . . Guthrie of that Ilk, upon 8 February …

To underlie such order as shall be prescribed touching the removing of the said feuds, etc. With certification that if they fail, ‘they shall be reputed, held and pursued with fire and sword, as enemies to God, his Majesty, and to the common weal and quietness of this their native country, with all rigour and extremity.’

Why This Record Matters

  • Records the Laird of Guthrie (Guthrie of that Ilk) as a party to a deadly feud in late 1595, significant enough to be summoned before the King and Council alongside the Earl of Crawford.
  • Demonstrates the continued involvement of the principal Guthrie line in the feud culture of late-16th-century Scotland and the Crown’s efforts to suppress it.

Terms & Practices

  • Deadly feud: A state of ongoing private warfare or blood feud between kindreds.
  • Charge to appear before the King and Council: A common mechanism used by James VI to force warring parties to submit to arbitration or royal order for the removal of feuds.
  • Certification of fire and sword: The formal warning that non-compliance would result in being treated as public enemies.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume I · Part 3, p. 352.
Digital access: Volume I · Part 3 · 1584–1596
Alexander Guthre of that Ilk (deceased); Isobel Wod, Lady Guthre (relict); James Guthre of Gagye; David Guthre & Gabriell Guthre (sons)
Volume I · Part 3 · page 372
Date8 June 1596 (with royal warrant dated 4 June 1596)
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Alexander Guthre of that Ilk (the deceased)
  • Isobel Wod, Lady Guthre (his relict)
  • James Guthre of Gagye
  • David Guthre and Gabriell Guthre (sons of the deceased)
  • The kin and friends of the late Alexander Guthre of that Ilk
Role
  • Alexander Guthre of that Ilk is the victim of the cruel slaughter.
  • His widow (Isobel Wod, Lady Guthre), James Guthrie of Gagye, and his sons David and Gabriel, together with the kin and friends, are the pursuers who purchased letters to bring Thomas Gardyn to justice.
  • James Guthrie of Gagye compears, produces the letters, and takes surety.
Document FocusProceedings against Thomas Gardyn for the cruel slaughter of Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk, including the production of letters by the widow and kin, the finding of surety, and the subsequent royal deferral of the diet because the feud had been submitted to the Council for reconciliation.
Original LanguageScots (with Latin heading and royal warrant in Scots)
Other Primary Parties
  • Thomas Gardyn, sometime in Bandoch, now in Legatstoun (the accused)
  • Mr Jacobus Fowlis (Justice-Depute)
  • Mr David Peirsoun (who produced the royal warrant)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage

[Mr Jacobus Fowlis, Justice-Depute, constituted by commission of our sovereign lord the King.]

Slaughter.

8 June. — Thomas Gardyn, sometime in Bandoch, now in Legatstoun.

Compeared James Guthrie of Gagye, and produced our sovereign lord’s letters, duly executed and endorsed, which had been purchased by Isobel Wod, Lady Guthre, the relict; James Guthre of Gagye; David and Gabriel Guthries, sons; together with the kin and friends of the late Alexander Guthre of that Ilk. These letters were to take surety of Thomas Gardyn, sometime in Bandoch, now in Legatstoun, that he should compear before our Sovereign’s Justice and his Deputes this day and place, and underlie the law for art and part of the cruel slaughter of the said late Alexander Guthre of that Ilk. He desired process thereupon, and protested that he, as cautioner, should be relieved of his cautionary obligation.

Compeared Mr David Peirsoun, and produced a Warrant of his Majesty, dated at Linlithgow the 4th day of June instant, to desert the diet; and he desired that the same should be obeyed. The tenor of the Warrant follows:

REX,

Justice, Justice-Clerk and your deputes, We greet you well. Forasmuch as it is understood to us that our other Letters have been raised, at the instance of the children, kin and friends of the late Alexander Guthre of that Ilk, and of our Advocates for our interest, for calling of Thomas Gardyn of Bandoch to underlie our laws before you, upon the 8th day of June instant, for art and part of the Slaughter of the said late Alexander, as our said Letters at length bear: Notwithstanding whereof, in respect We have already caused that deadly feud standing between the houses of Gardyn and Guthre, among others, to be assured and submitted to certain of our Council, Barons and Ministers, for reconciliation and removing thereof; all such pursuits would in the meantime be stayed that may hinder the same: And therefore it is our will, and We command you, that upon the sight hereof you desert the said diet, appointed the said 8th day of June instant; and in no wise unlaw the said Thomas nor his cautioner for not entering thereat, but desist from all manner of proceeding therein; that according to the submission, the remaining of the feud may be the better handled, and proceed without impediment. As you will answer to us upon your office and obedience: Whereanent these presents shall be your warrant. Subscribed with our hand, at Linlithgow, the 4th day of June, 1596.

(Signed) JAMES R.

Which Warrant the Justice obeyed, and thereupon deserted the said Court, in respect that no contrary warrant was produced.

Why This Record Matters

  • Records the violent death of Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk at the hands of Thomas Gardyn.
  • Explicitly names his widow Isobel Wod (styled Lady Guthre) and at least two sons, David and Gabriel.
  • Shows James Guthrie of Gagye acting on behalf of the family in the prosecution.
  • Demonstrates that a formal deadly feud existed between the houses of Guthrie and Gardyn, which King James VI was actively attempting to settle by compulsory arbitration in 1596.

Terms & Practices

  • Letters purchased by the kin: Private criminal prosecution initiated by the widow and nearest of kin.
  • Taking surety / caution: Binding the accused (or a cautioner for him) to appear under financial penalty.
  • Deadly feud submitted to the Council: The Crown’s preferred method in the 1590s for ending private warfare by compulsory arbitration before members of the Privy Council, barons and ministers.
  • Deserting the diet: Formally abandoning or postponing the appointed trial day by royal warrant.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume I · Part 3, p. 372.
Digital access: Volume I · Part 3 · 1584–1596

Volume II · Part 1

1596–1600
Reviewed — 4 Guthrie references found
Mr Dauid Guthre
Volume II · Part 1 · page 74
Date30–31 January 1599 (warrant dated 30 January 1598)
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Mr Dauid Guthre (Master David Guthrie)
RolePrelocutor (counsel) for William Murray, the pursuer / injured party.
Document FocusProceedings against George Home in Aytoune for umbesetting William Murray on Coldingham Moor and masterfully stealing a large sum of money from him. Master David Guthrie appears as counsel for the pursuer and requests a continuation.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • George Home in Aytoune (the accused)
  • Williame Murray, burgess of Edinburgh (the victim of the robbery)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
30 January. — George Home in Aytoune.

Delated of umbesetting of William Murray, burgess of Edinburgh, upon Coldingham-moor, and masterfully stealing from him of one thousand three-score seven pounds 4s. 4d. in gold and silver.

Compeared Mr David Guthrie, as prelocutor for William Murray, who has special interest in this matter; and desired this matter may continue until the morrow, that he may come sufficiently instructed with probationes, that (he) cannot have for the present. — The pannel desired that he might be put to the knowledge of an Assize of country men.

31 January. — Compeared William Murray, merchant burgess of Edinburgh, and produced a Warrant, subscribed by the King’s Majesty… [ordering the proceedings against George Home to be stayed until further warrant].

Why This Record Matters

  • Records Master David Guthrie acting as prelocutor (legal counsel) for a burgess of Edinburgh in a major robbery case in 1599.
  • The designation “Mr” indicates he was a university graduate, consistent with other educated members of the family appearing in professional legal roles at this period.

Terms & Practices

  • Prelocutor / Preloquitour: Counsel or advocate speaking on behalf of a party.
  • Umbesetting the highway: The crime of lying in wait on a public road to attack or rob travellers.
  • Masterful theft: Theft committed with force or violence.
  • Continuation for probationes: Postponement to allow the party to bring sufficient proof.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume II · Part 1, p. 74.
Digital access: Volume II · Part 1 · 1596–1600
Alexander Guthrie, elder of Kincaldrum; David Guthrie, younger of Kincaldrum; Gedeon Guthrie in Lytill Lowre; Williame Guthre of Langlandis of Guthrie; Alexander Guthrie, fiar of that Ilk; James Guthrie (deceased, son of Alexander of that Ilk)
Volume II · Part 1 · page 101
Date14–18 December 1599 (33 James VI)
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Alexander Guthrie, elder of Kincaldrum
  • David Guthrie, younger of Kincaldrum
  • Gedeon Guthrie, in Lytill Lowre
  • Williame Guthre of Langlandis of Guthrie
  • Alexander Guthrie, fiar of that Ilk
  • James Guthrie (the deceased), son to Alexander Guthrie (elder) of that Ilk
Role
  • Five members of the Guthrie family (together with two others) are delated of art and part in the slaughter of James Guthrie, son of Alexander Guthrie (elder) of that Ilk.
  • The victim is himself a Guthrie of the principal line.
Document FocusDelation and initial proceedings against a group of men (including several Guthries) for the slaughter of James Guthrie, son of Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk, committed in June 1599. The case was continued and ultimately remitted to the Justice Ayre of Forfar.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • Johne Rynd, younger of Kerse
  • Arthour Erskyn, portioner of Auchterforfar
  • Mr Robert Lyntoune and Mr Thomas Hammiltoune of Drumcarne (Advocates / pursuers)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
14 December. — Alexander Guthrie, elder of Kincaldrum; David Guthrie, younger of Kincaldrum; John Rynd, younger of Kerse; Arthur Erskine, portioner of Auchterforfar; Gideon Guthrie, in Little Lowre; William Guthrie of Langlands of Guthrie; Alexander Guthrie, fiar of that Ilk.

Delated of art and part of the slaughter of the late James Guthrie, son to Alexander Guthrie (elder) of that Ilk; committed in June last bypast.

The Justice continues this matter to the morrow; and the Assize, compearing, were warned personally to compear the morrow; each person under the pain of two hundred marks.

15 December. — Continued to 18 December; the Inquest of new to compear the said day.

18 December. — Continued to the Justice-aire of the sheriffdom of Forfar, or sooner upon 15 days’ warning.

Why This Record Matters

  • Records an intra-family (or closely related) killing: James Guthrie, son of Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk, was slain in June 1599.
  • Among those accused are Alexander Guthrie, elder of Kincaldrum; his son David (younger of Kincaldrum); Gideon Guthrie in Little Lowre; William Guthrie of Langlands of Guthrie; and Alexander Guthrie, fiar of that Ilk.
  • Demonstrates serious internal conflict involving both the principal Guthrie of that Ilk line and the Kincaldrum branch at the end of the 16th century.

Terms & Practices

  • Dilatio / Delation: Formal accusation before the Justice Court.
  • Art and part: Being accessory to, or participating in, the crime.
  • Continuation to the Justice Ayre: Remitting the case from the central court to the next circuit court of the relevant sheriffdom (here Forfar).
  • Warning under pain of 200 marks: Standard penalty for non-appearance of assizers.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume II · Part 1, p. 101.
Digital access: Volume II · Part 1 · 1596–1600
Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk (deceased); Alexander Guthrie, younger of that Ilk
Volume II · Part 1 · page 103
Date8 January 1600 (33 James VI)
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk (the deceased)
  • Alexander Guthrie, younger of that Ilk (the pursuer)
Role
  • Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk is the victim of the slaughter (committed in October 1587 by hamesucken).
  • Alexander Guthrie, younger of that Ilk, is the pursuer of the action.
Document FocusDelation of Thomas Gairdyn of Legatstoune for the hamesucken and slaughter of Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk in 1587. The accused produces a royal remission and is ordered to find caution to satisfy the party.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • Thomas Gairdyn of Legatstoune (the accused)
  • William Stewart of Seytoun and George Gardin of Latoune (cautioners)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
8 January 1600. — Thomas Gairdyn of Legatstoune.

Delated of art and part of the slaughter of the late Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk; committed in the month of October, the year of God 1587, by way of Hamesucken, beside the Place of Inverpeffer, upon set purpose, provision, old feud and forethought felony.

Pursuer: Alexander Guthrie, younger of that Ilk.

The pannel produced our sovereign lord’s Remission under the Great Seal, dated at Aberdeen the first day of August 1589, granted by his Highness for the said crime, and took him thereto: Which was admitted by the Justice-depute, who ordained him to find caution and surety to satisfy the party, as law will: Like as, the said Thomas, for obedience of the said ordinance, found William Stewart of Seytoun, George Gardin of Latoune, and himself.

Why This Record Matters

  • Confirms the earlier 1596 proceedings: Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk was killed by Thomas Gardyn (Gairdyn) in October 1587 by hamesucken near Inverpeffer.
  • Shows that by January 1600 the pursuer is Alexander Guthrie, younger of that Ilk (presumably the son and successor).
  • The accused had obtained a royal remission as early as August 1589, but was still required in 1600 to find caution for assythment of the party.

Terms & Practices

  • Hamesucken: The crime of assaulting a person in their own house or dwelling-place (an aggravated form of assault).
  • Remission under the Great Seal: Royal pardon for a capital crime.
  • Satisfy the party / Assythment: Payment of compensation to the kin of the slain person, required even after a remission.
  • Forethought felony: Premeditated killing.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume II · Part 1, p. 103.
Digital access: Volume II · Part 1 · 1596–1600
Patrik Guthre of Pitmowes
Volume II · Part 1 · page 130
Date15 July 1600 (with royal warrant dated 28 June 1600)
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Patrik Guthre of Pitmowes (Patrick Guthrie of Pitmuies / Pitmowes)
RoleOne of those initially delated for art and part in the slaughter of Patrick Rynd and the wounding of Alexander, Lord Spynie. A royal warrant ordered him to be deleted from the criminal summons so that he should not be called or pursued for the matter.
Document FocusDelation of the Master of Ogilvie and others for the slaughter of Patrick Rynd and the wounding of Lord Spynie in a conflict in March 1600, together with a royal warrant removing Patrick Guthrie of Pitmowes from the list of accused.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • James, Master of Ogilvie; Sir Johne Ogilvie of Craig; Mr Dauid Ogilvie; Frances Ogilvie (the principal accused, brothers)
  • James Gordoun (servant to the Master)
  • Johne Barclay (son to George Barclay of the Syde)
  • Patrick Rynd (the deceased, son of William Rynd of Kerse)
  • Alexander, Lord Spynie (the wounded party)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
15 July. — James, Master of Ogilvie, Sir John Ogilvie of Craig, Mr David Ogilvie, Frances Ogilvie, all brothers; James Gordon, servant to the Master; Patrick Guthrie of Pitmowes; John Barclay, son to George Barclay of the Syde.

Delated of art and part of the slaughter of the late Patrick Rynd, son to William Rynd of Kerse; and of the hurting of Alexander, Lord Spynie, in the head; committed in March last bypast.

Mr Oliver Colt produced a Warrant, directed to the Treasurer and Advocate, for deleting of Patrick Guthrie; whereof the tenor follows:

REX,

Treasurer and Advocate, We greet you well. It is our will, and We command you, that, upon the sight hereof, you delete Patrick Guthrie of Pitmowes forth of the criminal summons raised at your instance against the Master of Ogilvie, and such as accompanied him on the fields at the late Conflict between him and our cousin the Lord of Spynie; so that he be in no wise called nor pursued therefore: As you will answer to us upon your offices and obedience: Whereanent these presents shall be your warrant. Subscribed with our hand, at Holyroodhouse, this 28th day of June, 1600.

(Signed) JAMES R.

Which Precept the Justice, with advice of Alexander, Master of Elphinstoun, and Mr Thomas Hamilton, admitted; and ordained no process against the said Patrick Guthrie nor his cautioner.

Why This Record Matters

  • Records Patrick Guthrie of Pitmowes as initially implicated in a violent clash in March 1600 between the Master of Ogilvie’s party and Lord Spynie, in which Patrick Rynd was killed and Lord Spynie wounded in the head.
  • Shows that the King personally intervened by warrant to have Patrick Guthrie removed from the prosecution, indicating either influence on his behalf or a determination that he should not be pursued.

Terms & Practices

  • Deleting from the summons: Formal removal of a person’s name from the list of those to be prosecuted.
  • Hamesucken / Conflict on the fields: Open armed confrontation between noble parties.
  • Royal warrant to the Treasurer and Advocate: Direct royal instruction to the public prosecutors.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume II · Part 1, p. 130.
Digital access: Volume II · Part 1 · 1596–1600

Volume II · Part 2

1600–1609
Reviewed — 4 Guthrie references found
Bishop Guthrie
Volume II · Part 2 · page 277
Editorial / collateral reference
DateJune 1609 (forfeiture proceedings); related events of 1600 (Gowrie Conspiracy)
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Bishop Guthrie (editorial reference only)
RoleMentioned solely in an editorial footnote by Pitcairn, citing Bishop Guthrie’s Memoirs (Glasgow, 1747, p. 250) concerning a later case involving the raising of the bones of Archibald, Lord Napier. He is not a party to the Gowrie Conspiracy proceedings or the forfeiture of Robert Logan of Restalrig.
Document FocusParliamentary proceedings for the forfeiture of the memory, name, dignity, and estates of the deceased Robert Logan of Restalrig for high treason in connection with the Gowrie Conspiracy of August 1600. Includes the summons, production of Logan’s letters, depositions proving his handwriting, the doom of forfeiture, and related warrants.
Original LanguageScots and Latin (with extensive editorial commentary in English)
Other Primary Parties
  • Robert Logan of Restalrig (the deceased traitor whose memory and estates are being forfeited)
  • Robert Logan, his eldest son (the heir against whom the summons of treason is directed)
  • The Earl of Gowrie and Mr Alexander Ruthven (the principal conspirators of 1600)
  • George Sprott (the notary whose confessions revealed Logan’s involvement)
  • Sir Thomas Hamilton of Byres (Lord Advocate)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
(No contemporary Guthrie appears as a party. The sole reference is editorial:)

Bishop Guthrie also in his Memoirs (Glasgow, 1747, p. 250) mentions, in the case of Archibald Lord Napier, “The Committee resolved to raise his bones, and pass a sentence of forfeiture thereupon…”

Why This Record Matters

  • No member of the Guthrie family is involved as a party, witness, or official in these proceedings.
  • The reference to Bishop Guthrie is purely an editorial illustration by Pitcairn of the practice of forfeiting the memory of a deceased traitor by raising his bones.

Terms & Practices

  • Forfeiture of memory and estates: The process of declaring a deceased person’s name, arms, and property forfeited for treason, even after death.
  • Doom of Forfeiture: The formal judgment of Parliament extinguishing the traitor’s name and transferring his property to the Crown.
  • Summons of Treason against the heir: Used to pursue the representative of a deceased traitor.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume II · Part 2, p. 277.
Digital access: Volume II · Part 2 · 1600–1609
Robert Guthrie, servant to Mr Alexander Gibson
Volume II · Part 2 · page 428
Date12 January 1604
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Robert Guthrie, servant to Mr Alexander Gibson
RoleVictim of hamesucken, oppression, and stouthreif. He was attacked and taken captive (along with his master) by George Meldrum, younger of Dumbreck, near the Water of Dundee, and later released at Kinghorn while his master continued to be held.
Document FocusTrial of George Meldrum, younger of Dumbreck, for multiple crimes including treason, hamesucken, oppression, and stouthreif, one of which involved the armed seizure of Mr Alexander Gibson and his servant Robert Guthrie.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • George Meldrum, younger of Dumbreck (the accused)
  • Mr Alexander Gibson (Clerk of Council and Session; principal victim who was held longer)
  • Mr Alexander Livingston, advocate
  • Andro Meldrum of Achquharteis (brother of the accused; also a victim in earlier incidents)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
(Relevant extract)

… being advertised of the said Mr Alexander’s diet by a fellow called Craik, the said George Meldrum’s own man, whom he sent to espy the said Mr Alexander’s diet within the City of St Andrews; at the which time he set upon the said Mr Alexander Gibson, Mr Alexander Livingston, advocate, and Robert Guthrie, servant to the said Mr Alexander Gibson, within the bounds of the sheriffdom of Fife, beside the Water-side of Dundee, where they were in sober and quiet manner riding for the time, dreading no harm, injury, or pursuit of any persons, but to have lived under God’s peace and our sovereign lord’s: and there cruelly invaded them for their slaughters, and compelled them to render themselves to the said George and his complices foresaid; and treasonably put violent hands in their persons, took them captives and prisoners, had and convoyed them away with him out of the way, and beside Cupar-in-Fife (he being a landed gentleman), treasonably, by way of masterful stouthreif, reft from them their purses, with certain gold and silver being therein, extending to the quantity of three hundred marks or thereby; and thereafter convoyed them to the town of Kinghorn, where he dismissed the said Mr Alexander Livingston and Robert Guthrie: And thereafter convoyed the said Alexander Gibson, and brought him with themselves over the ferry of Kinghorn to Leith…

Why This Record Matters

  • Records a Robert Guthrie employed as servant to Mr Alexander Gibson, one of the Clerks of the Council and Session, in 1604.
  • Shows him caught up in a violent attack by George Meldrum of Dumbreck while travelling in Fife.

Terms & Practices

  • Hamesucken: Assaulting a person in their dwelling or (by extension) while going about their lawful business.
  • Stouthreif: Theft committed with force or violence (robbery).
  • Masterful stouthreif: Robbery carried out in an especially violent or high-handed manner.
  • Demittit: Dismissed / released.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume II · Part 2, p. 428.
Digital access: Volume II · Part 2 · 1600–1609
Williame Guthrie of Ravensbie
Volume II · Part 2 · page 528
Date26 June 1607
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Williame Guthrie of Ravensbie (William Guthrie of Ravensbie)
RoleAccused (delated) of art and part in the slaughters of Patrick Gairdin of that Ilk and Robert Gairdin of Tullois (committed in 1588).
Document FocusDelation of William Guthrie of Ravensbie for the long-standing slaughters of two members of the Gairdin (Garden) family, with surety found for his appearance at the next Justice Ayre of Aberdeen.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • Patrick Gairdin of that Ilk and Robert Gairdin of Tullois (the deceased)
  • Mr Robert Gairdin, younger of Blairtoune (pursuer)
  • George Leslie, fiar of Kincraigie (pledge/surety for the accused)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
26 June. — William Guthrie of Ravensbie.

Delated of art and part of the Slaughters of the late Patrick Gairdin of that Ilk, and the late Robert Gairdin of Tullois, committed in the month of . . . . 1588.

Pursuer: Mr Robert Gairdin, younger of Blairtoune.

George Leslie, fiar of Kincraigie, became pledge and surety that he shall compear before the Justice or his deputes, the third day of the next Justice-aire of the sheriffdom of Aberdeen, or sooner, upon 15 days’ warning.

Why This Record Matters

  • Records William Guthrie of Ravensbie as accused in 1607 of involvement in the 1588 killings of Patrick Garden of that Ilk and Robert Garden of Tullois.
  • Shows a Guthrie of the Ravensbie designation still facing legal consequences nearly twenty years after the alleged crimes.

Terms & Practices

  • Dilatio / Delation: Formal accusation.
  • Art and part: Being accessory to or participating in the crime.
  • Pledge and surety for appearance at the Justice Ayre: Standard procedure to secure the accused’s attendance at the next circuit court.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume II · Part 2, p. 528.
Digital access: Volume II · Part 2 · 1600–1609
George Guthrie, servant to the late Alexander, Lord Spynie
Volume II · Part 2 · page 529
Date8 July 1607
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • George Guthrie, servant to the late Alexander, Lord Spynie
RoleServant of the deceased who compears in court and produces the letters of summons purchased by Lady Spynie and the kin, in order to take surety of the accused for the slaughter of his late master.
Document FocusProceedings to take surety of a group of Lindsays and others for the slaughter of Alexander, Lord Spynie. George Guthrie, as servant of the deceased, produces the letters and acts on behalf of the pursuers.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • Alexander, Lord Spynie (the deceased)
  • Dame Jeane Lyoun, Lady Spynie (the relict)
  • Alexander, Master of Spynie (eldest son)
  • David, Earl of Crawford, Lord Lindsay, and other Lindsay kin (pursuers)
  • David Lyndsay, fiar of Edzell, and several other Lindsays and associates (the accused)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
8 July. — David Lyndsay, fiar of Edzell; Thomas Lyndsay … [and others].

Compeared George Guthrie, servant to the late Alexander, Lord Spynie, and produced our sovereign lord’s Letters, duly executed and endorsed, purchased at the instance of Dame Jeane Lyoun, Lady Spynie, the relict; Alexander, Master of Spynie, eldest son; David, Earl of Crawford, Lord Lindsay, etc., Sir Harie Lindsay of Carriestoun, knight, Sir Johnne Lindsay of Woidwrae, knight, as brothers, with the remaining kin and friends of the late Alexander, Lord Spynie; to take surety of the said David, etc., that they should compear before the Justice or his deputes this day and place, in the hour of cause, to underlie the law, for art and part of the Slaughter of the said late Alexander, Lord Spynie. By the which Letters, the said persons were denounced our sovereign lord’s rebels and put to the horn. Upon the production whereof, the said George Guthrie asked instruments, and protested for relief of Harie Lyndsay of Carrestoune, cautioner for reproduction thereof.

Why This Record Matters

  • Records a George Guthrie serving in the household of Alexander, Lord Spynie, at the time of (or shortly after) Lord Spynie’s death.
  • Shows him trusted to appear in the Justice Court and produce the formal letters on behalf of the widow and kin.

Terms & Practices

  • Letters purchased at the instance of the kin: Private criminal prosecution initiated by the nearest of kin.
  • Taking surety: Binding the accused to appear under financial penalty.
  • Denounced rebels and put to the horn: Formal process after non-appearance.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume II · Part 2, p. 529.
Digital access: Volume II · Part 2 · 1600–1609

Volume III · Part 1

1609–1615
Reviewed — 4 Guthrie references found
William Guthrie (servant / man of the young Laird of Pittarrow)
Volume III · Part 1 · page 61
Date17 June 1605 (the incident); the trial material is from 1609
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • William Guthrie (also referred to simply as “Guthrie”), servant / man of the young Laird of Pittarrow (Wishart)
RoleVictim. He was slain in a street fight in Edinburgh on 17 June 1605 between the party of the young Laird of Edzell (Lindsay) and the young Laird of Pittarrow. Contemporary accounts describe him as “ane verie prettie young man” and record that his body was afterwards examined by the Bailies and surgeons to determine whether his wounds were mortal.
Document FocusEditorial and contemporary accounts prefixed to the 1609 proceedings concerning the slaughter of Lord Spynie. They record an earlier violent clash in Edinburgh in June 1605 in which a servant of Pittarrow named Guthrie was killed.
Original LanguageScots (with English editorial commentary)
Other Primary Parties
  • The young Laird of Edzell (Sir David Lindsay) and his complices
  • The young Laird of Pittarrow (Wishart) and his complices
  • Alexander, Lord Spynie (whose later death in 1607 is the main subject of the surrounding case)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
(From the contemporary notices quoted by Pitcairn)

“The 17 of June (1605) a combat or tulzie foughten at the Salt-tron of Edinburgh, between the Laird of Edzell, younger, and his complices, and the young Laird of Pittarrow, Wishart. The fight lasted from 9 hours at night till 11 at night, two hours! There were sundry hurt on both sides, and one Guthrie slain, which was Pittarrow’s man; a very pretty young man. The 18 day they were accused before the Council, and warded.”

And further:

“… the Lords, having respect to the Slaughter of William Guthrie, servant to Pittarrow, had commanded him [Edzell] to ward, albeit he understood the said Guthrie to have received no wounds, but to have been smothered in the throng…”

Why This Record Matters

  • Records the death of a young man named William Guthrie, servant to the Laird of Pittarrow (Wishart), in a street fight in Edinburgh on 17 June 1605.
  • The incident formed part of the wider Lindsay–Wishart feud that later escalated into the killing of Lord Spynie.

Terms & Practices

  • Tulzie / Combat in the streets: Open armed affray within a burgh.
  • Warding: Committal to ward (imprisonment) by order of the Privy Council.
  • Examination of the corpse by Bailies and surgeons: Standard procedure to determine whether death resulted from wounds or other causes (here, possible smothering in the press).
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume III · Part 1, p. 61.
Digital access: Volume III · Part 1 · 1609–1615
Williame Guthrie of Ravensbie; Alexander Guthrie, fiar of that Ilk
Volume III · Part 1 · page 77
Date29 December 1610
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Williame Guthrie of Ravensbie (William Guthrie of Ravensbie)
  • Alexander Guthrie, fiar of that Ilk
Role
  • William Guthrie of Ravensbie is the accused (delated of the slaughter of Patrick Gairdin of that Ilk, committed in May 1578).
  • Alexander Guthrie, fiar of that Ilk, becomes cautioner with him to satisfy the party.
Document FocusFurther proceedings against William Guthrie of Ravensbie for the long-outstanding slaughter of Patrick Garden of that Ilk. He produces a royal respite and is ordered to find caution for assythment; Alexander Guthrie, fiar of that Ilk, joins him as cautioner.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • Patrick Gairdin of that Ilk (the deceased)
  • Robert Gairdin, oy (grandson) to the defunct (pursuer)
  • Mr Thomas Hoip (prelocutor for the pannel)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
29 December. — William Guthrie of Ravensbie.

Delated of art and part of the Slaughter of the late Patrick Gairdin of that Ilk; committed in May 1578.

Pursuers: Robert Gairdin, oy to the defunct; Mr Thomas Henderson, substitute to the Lord Advocate. Prelocutor for the pannel: Mr Thomas Hoip.

The pannel takes instruments of his entry; and produced a Respite, under the Privy Seal, of the date 24 January 1600, made and granted for the space of 19 years: And, in respect thereof, alleged that the Justice could not put him to the trial of an Assize. — It is answered, that the Respite is null; in respect, conform to the Act of Parliament, he should have satisfied the party, and shown a Letter of Slains thereupon.

The Justice admits the Respite produced; and Ordains the pannel to find caution to satisfy the party; who found Alexander Guthrie, fiar of that Ilk, cautioner with himself, to satisfy the party; conform to the laws of this realm.

Why This Record Matters

  • Continues the long-running case against William Guthrie of Ravensbie for the 1578 killing of Patrick Garden of that Ilk (previously noted in 1607).
  • Shows Alexander Guthrie, fiar of that Ilk, standing surety for him in 1610, indicating continued connection between the Ravensbie and principal Guthrie of that Ilk lines.

Terms & Practices

  • Respite under the Privy Seal: A temporary royal protection from prosecution, granted for a fixed number of years.
  • Letter of Slains: Formal discharge by the kin of the slain person after receiving assythment (compensation).
  • Caution to satisfy the party: Requirement to find security for payment of assythment even when a respite is accepted.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume III · Part 1, p. 77.
Digital access: Volume III · Part 1 · 1609–1615
Williame Guthrie of Ravensbie (lawful son to the late Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk); the Laird of Guthrie; Alexander Guthrie, fiar of that Ilk
Volume III · Part 1 · page 80
Date25 July 1610
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Williame Guthrie of Ravensbie, lawful son to the late Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk
  • Alexander Guthrie, fiar of that Ilk (cautioner)
  • The Laird of Guthrie (prelocutor in defence)
Role
  • William Guthrie of Ravensbie is the accused (delated of the slaughter of Robert Gairdin of Tullois in 1589).
  • He is explicitly identified as the lawful son of the late Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk.
  • The Laird of Guthrie appears as one of his prelocutors.
  • Alexander Guthrie, fiar of that Ilk, stands cautioner with him.
Document FocusTrial proceedings against William Guthrie of Ravensbie for the slaughter of Robert Garden of Tullois in November 1589. He produces a royal respite and is ordered to find caution for satisfaction of the party.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • Robert Gairdin of Tullois (the deceased)
  • Robert Gairdin (only son of the deceased) and Mr Robert Gairdin, apparent of Blairtoun (pursuers)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
25 July. — William Guthrie of Ravensbie, lawful son to the late Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk.

Delated of art and part of the Slaughter of the late Robert Gairdin of Tullois; committed upon the Muir called Carbundow-muir, in the highway between Brechin and Dundee, in the month of November 1589; upon set purpose, provision, and forethought felony.

Pursuers: Robert Gairdin, as only son to the late Robert Gairdin of Tullois; Mr Robert Gairdin, apparent of Blairtoun…

Prelocutors in defence: Mr Johnne Russell, the Laird of Guthrie.

The said William Guthrie took him to our sovereign lord’s Respite, given and granted to him by his Majesty, under the Privy Seal, for the said Slaughter, for the space of nineteen years after the date thereof; which is of date, at Holyroodhouse, the 24th day of January 1600…

The Justice… Admits the said Respite; and ordained the pannel to find caution to satisfy the party pursuer… Who, for obedience of the said Justice ordinance, found, with himself, Alexander Guthrie, fiar of that Ilk, cautioners, etc.

Why This Record Matters

  • Explicitly identifies William Guthrie of Ravensbie as the lawful son of the late Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk.
  • Shows the Laird of Guthrie acting as prelocutor in his defence and Alexander Guthrie, fiar of that Ilk, standing as cautioner — strong evidence of continued family solidarity.
  • Links the Ravensbie designation directly to the principal Guthrie of that Ilk line.

Terms & Practices

  • Respite under the Privy Seal: Temporary royal protection from prosecution.
  • Caution to satisfy the party: Security for payment of assythment to the kin of the slain person.
  • Prelocutor: Counsel speaking in defence of the accused.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume III · Part 1, p. 80.
Digital access: Volume III · Part 1 · 1609–1615
Mr James Guthrie (the Covenanter minister)
Volume III · Part 1 · page 196
Editorial / collateral reference
DateEditorial note (referring to events of 1661)
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Mr James Guthrie (the Covenanter minister)
RoleMentioned only in an editorial illustration of the superstition that a murdered person’s body (or, here, a severed head) might bleed in the presence of the guilty. Pitcairn recounts a popular story that drops of blood fell from Guthrie’s head (displayed on the Netherbow Port) onto Middleton’s coach.
Document FocusPart of a long editorial digression by Pitcairn on historical instances of the “bleeding corpse” test of guilt. The Guthrie reference is used as a late example of the persistence of the belief.
Original LanguageEnglish (editorial commentary)
Other Primary Parties
  • Middleton (whose coach is said to have been stained by the blood)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
(Editorial anecdote)

“Of a like nature with the last instance, a strange story is told in the Biographia Scoticana, which has likewise been elsewhere repeated. That a few days after Mr James Guthrie was executed, and his head placed upon the Netherbow Port of Edinburgh, Middleton’s coach coming down that way and passing through the Port, several drops of blood fell from the head upon the top of the coach; — which, as the legend goes, ‘all their art and diligence could not wipe off!’ Physicians were called, and desired to enquire if any natural cause could be given for this event — but they could give none! ‘This odd incident being noised abroad, and all means tried, at length the leather was removed, and a new cover put on!!! But this was much sooner done, than the wiping off the guilt of this great and good man’s blood upon the shedders of it, and the disgrace from this poor Nation!’”

Why This Record Matters

  • Refers to the well-known execution of the Covenanter minister James Guthrie in 1661.
  • The story is legendary/anecdotal and is included by Pitcairn only as an illustration of popular belief, not as a formal criminal trial record of the early 17th century.

Terms & Practices

  • Bleeding-corpse test: The folk belief that a murdered person’s body would bleed afresh if touched by, or brought into the presence of, the murderer.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume III · Part 1, p. 196.
Digital access: Volume III · Part 1 · 1609–1615

Volume III · Part 2

1615–1624
Reviewed — 3 Guthrie references found
Johnne Guthrie, alias callit Williame Laird
Volume III · Part 2 · page 428
Date14 March 1617 (sentence against John Guthrie follows immediately)
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Johnne Guthrie, alias callit Williame Laird (John Guthrie, alias William Laird)
RoleAccused and convicted of bigamy / adultery (marriage of two wives and keeping a third woman as concubine). Sentenced to death by hanging.
Document FocusTrial of three persons for adultery and bigamy. John Guthrie (alias William Laird) is specifically charged with having married two wives and keeping a third woman as his concubine; he is sentenced to death under a special royal warrant.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • Alexander Thomesone, skinner, burgess of Edinburgh (brother to Johnne Thomesone in Leith)
  • Jonet Cuthbert (both co-accused of adultery; they received mitigated sentences of banishment by royal warrant)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
14 March. — Alexander Thomesone, skinner, burgess of Edinburgh… ; Johnne Guthrie, alias callit Williame Laird, and Jonet Cuthbert.

Delated of the crimes of Adultery, committed by them, in manner, and at the times specified in their Dittays.

The pannels acknowledge the crimes contained in their several Dittays, and crave God and the King’s Majesty’s pardon; and offer themselves in his Majesty’s will therefor.

[Verdict of guilty follows. Alexander and Jonet receive mitigated sentences of banishment by royal warrant.]

Sentence against Johnne Guthrie, alias Williame Laird.

… His Majesty’s Warrant… to accuse and pursue… Johnne Guthrie, for marriage of two wives, and keeping (besides them) of a third woman for his concubine; which being a crime so odious and intolerable amongst Christians, and meriting to be most exemplarly punished… to cause pronounce and execute Doom and Sentence of Death against him…

The Justice Ordained the said Johnne Guthrie, alias Laird, to be taken to a gibbet, beside the Cross of Edinburgh, and there to be HANGED until he be dead; and all his moveable goods to be escheat and inbrought to his Majesty’s use, &c.

Why This Record Matters

  • Records a John Guthrie (who also used the alias William Laird) convicted of bigamy and adultery in Edinburgh in 1617 and sentenced to death.
  • No further identifying details (such as parentage or place of origin) are given in the entry.

Terms & Practices

  • Bigamy / Marriage of two wives: Treated as a capital crime.
  • Keeping a concubine: Aggravating circumstance in the charge.
  • Escheat of moveable goods: Forfeiture of personal property to the Crown upon conviction of a capital crime.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume III · Part 2, p. 428.
Digital access: Volume III · Part 2 · 1615–1624
Patrik Guthrie of Kinblakmonth
Volume III · Part 2 · page 437
Date18 March 1617
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Patrik Guthrie of Kinblakmonth (Patrick Guthrie of Kinblethmont / Kinblakmonth)
RoleAssizer (member of the jury) in the trial of Robert Symmer for slaughter.
Document FocusTrial of Robert Symmer for the cruel slaughter of David Graham near the Meikle Mill of Brechin on 29 April 1616. Patrick Guthrie of Kinblakmonth served on the Assize that convicted the accused.
Original LanguageScots
Other Primary Parties
  • Robert Symmer, son to the Laird of Balzordie (the accused)
  • David Graham, son to the late James Grahame of Leuchland (the deceased)
  • James Grahame (brother of the deceased) and other pursuers
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
(Assize list extract)

ASSISA … David Gairdin of Lawtoun, Patrik Guthrie of Kinblakmonth, Williame Carnagy, skynner, burgess of Edinburgh…

Verdict The Assize… all in one voice, by the mouth of the said Johnne Udny, chanceller, found the said Robert to be Fyled, culpable, and convict of the said Slaughter.

Sentence To be taken to the Mercat-cross of Edinburgh, and there his head to be struck from his body; and all his moveable goods to be escheat, &c.

Why This Record Matters

  • Records Patrick Guthrie of Kinblakmonth (Kinblethmont) serving as a juror in an Edinburgh Justice Court trial in March 1617 arising from a killing near Brechin.
  • Places a Guthrie of the Kinblethmont designation in a formal judicial role at this date.

Terms & Practices

  • Assisa / Assize: The jury of assizers who determined guilt or innocence.
  • Fyled, culpable and convict: Formal finding of guilt.
  • Striking the head from the body: Beheading as the method of execution.
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume III · Part 2, p. 437.
Digital access: Volume III · Part 2 · 1615–1624
Mr John Guthry, Minister
Volume III · Part 2 · page 585
Editorial / collateral reference
Date9 January 1621 (Kirk Session of Perth record, cited in editorial appendix)
Guthrie(s) Identified
  • Mr John Guthry, Minister
RoleMinister who reported to the Kirk Session of Perth that he had disbursed thirty shillings (from the Session treasury) to Andrew Ross to cover the expenses of travelling to visit his brother, Mr Thomas Ross, before the latter’s execution.
Document FocusEditorial appendix providing additional background on the family of Mr Thomas Ross and the charitable actions of the Kirk Session of Perth toward the family. The entry records a small payment facilitated by Mr John Guthry, Minister.
Original LanguageEnglish (editorial quotation from Kirk Session records)
Other Primary Parties
  • Mr Thomas Ross (the condemned man whose trial is the subject of the appendix)
  • Andrew Ross (brother of Mr Thomas Ross)
Modern English Translation / Key Passage
(Extract from the Kirk Session Records of Perth, as quoted by Pitcairn)

“Jan. 9, 1621. Mr John Guthry, Minister, reported, that he had given thirty shillings, which he had received from the Thesaury, to Andrew Ross, to bear his expenses, when he passed to the visitation of [his brother] umquhil Mr Thomas Ross, before his execution.”

Why This Record Matters

  • Records a Mr John Guthry serving as a Minister (almost certainly of Perth or in the Perth area) in January 1621.
  • Shows him acting in an official capacity for the Kirk Session in providing practical assistance to the brother of a condemned man.

Terms & Practices

  • Thesaury (of the Kirk Session): The common fund of the parish session used for charitable relief.
  • Visitation before execution: The customary allowance for family members to visit a condemned person prior to the carrying out of sentence
Source: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, Volume III · Part 2, p. 585.
Digital access: Volume III · Part 2 · 1615–1624

Guthrie Research Sketches

These short syntheses connect related proceedings without treating repeated names or territorial designations as automatic proof of identity.

Guthrie of that Ilk · Justice, Feud & Succession

1510–1610 · several generations, not one Alexander

The criminal records place successive members of the main Guthrie line in very different legal roles. In 1510 an Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk, knight, served as Justiciar Depute at the Peebles Justice Ayre. By 1577 another Alexander of that Ilk sat on an assize with David Guthrie of Kincaldrum and Henry Guthrie of Colliston.

The later entries are dominated by feud and succession. In 1595 “Guthrie of that Ilk” was ordered before the King and Council in connection with a deadly feud. In 1596 the slain Alexander of that Ilk is explicitly linked to his widow Isobel Wood, sons David and Gabriel, and James Guthrie of Gagie. The 1599–1600 entries then involve the younger/fiar of that Ilk and the killing of James Guthrie, son of Alexander of that Ilk.

Assessment: the records form a valuable lineage sequence, but repeated uses of “Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk” span generations. They should not be collapsed into one man.

Kincaldrum · A Family in the Legal Record

1570–1599 · surety, assize and criminal prosecution

The Kincaldrum Guthries recur as legally responsible landholders. Alexander Guthrie of Kincaldrum stood pledge in a 1570 replegiation proceeding. David Guthrie, fiar of Kincaldrum, served on an assize in 1577. In 1591 Alexander Guthrie, fiar and apparent of Kincaldrum, became cautioner for the Master of Angus in a bond valued at £10,000.

The tone changes sharply in 1599, when Alexander Guthrie, elder of Kincaldrum, and David Guthrie, younger of Kincaldrum, were among several Guthries accused in the slaughter of James Guthrie, son of Alexander of that Ilk.

Assessment: the sequence shows continuity of the territorial designation while also demonstrating why “Kincaldrum” records must be read generation by generation.

Ravensbie & the Garden Feud

1580s allegations revisited in 1607–1610

William Guthrie of Ravensbie appears repeatedly in proceedings arising from the deaths of members of the Garden/Gairdin family. In 1607 he was delated for art and part in the earlier slaughters of Patrick Gairdin of that Ilk and Robert Gairdin of Tullois. Further proceedings in 1610 revisited the cases, including production of a long respite.

One 1610 entry is especially genealogically valuable because William is explicitly described as the lawful son of the late Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk. The Laird of Guthrie appears as prelocutor and Alexander Guthrie, fiar of that Ilk, as cautioner.

Assessment: these entries are not isolated accusations; together they preserve kinship and legal relationships within the main line while documenting a long-running feud.

Editorial Guthrie References

Useful evidence, but not parties to the original trial

Three indexed references require a different evidentiary label. “Bishop Guthrie” appears only in Pitcairn’s editorial footnote to the Logan forfeiture proceedings. Rev. James Guthrie appears in a later anecdote about his 1661 execution. Mr John Guthry, minister, appears through a Kirk Session of Perth quotation inserted in an editorial appendix.

Assessment: these references belong in the finding aid because Pitcairn printed them, but they should not be treated as contemporary participants in the surrounding High Court case.

Edition History · Why the Page Uses One Survey

1829–1833: Pitcairn’s extracts first appeared in ten successive parts as Criminal Trials and Other Proceedings before the High Court of Justiciary in Scotland.

1833: After completion, the collection was reissued with new title pages as Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland, arranged as three volumes in seven parts and distributed through the Bannatyne Club, with some sets also associated with the Maitland Club.

Research treatment on this page: the seven-part 1833 arrangement is the canonical finding aid. The ten-part issue is not indexed a second time because doing so would duplicate the same underlying Guthrie proceedings under a different physical arrangement.

Sources & Access

Canonical citation: Robert Pitcairn, ed., Ancient Criminal Trials in Scotland: Compiled from the Original Records and MSS., with Historical Illustrations, &c., 3 vols. in 7 parts (Edinburgh: printed for the Bannatyne Club, 1833).

Earlier publication form: Robert Pitcairn, Criminal Trials and Other Proceedings before the High Court of Justiciary in Scotland, 10 parts (Edinburgh, 1829–1833).

Digitized canonical parts:

The digitized copies come from more than one repository because no single open copy was used for all seven physical parts. The page citations therefore identify the canonical part and printed page, while each Source button opens a complete digitized copy of that part.

Guthrie Genealogy · Special Collections
High Court of Justiciary Records · Thistle Archive

Leave a Reply