Register
of the
Privy Council of Scotland

Overview and Contents: This series documents the reign of Charles I, the Bishops’ Wars, the National Covenant (1638), the Wars of the Three Kingdoms, and the early Restoration. It covers ecclesiastical tensions, military levies, taxation, and social order amid revolution and occupation. Includes sederunts and broader miscellaneous papers.

For Guthrie Genealogy all mentions of a Guthrie person or place have been excerpted, transcribed or summarized, along with the individual’s role, historical and genealogical significance, and an explanation of legal terms and Scottish practices.

Navigation links will take you volume to volume. Summary tables will provide a quick reference to the contents, along with quick links to take you directly to the entry.

Second Series Timelines and Regnal Periods:

• Vol. 1: 1625–1627 (early Charles I).
• Vol. 2: 1627–1628.
• Vol. 3: 1629–1630.
• Vol. 4: 1630–1632.
• Vol. 5: 1633–1635.
• Vol. 6: 1635–1637.
• Vol. 7: 1638–1643 (Covenanting height).
• Vol. 8: 1644–1660 (with miscellaneous papers from c. 1544), covering civil wars and Commonwealth/Protectorate transitions.

Key Context and Implications: Marked by religious innovation (e.g., Charles’s liturgical policies), resistance, and warfare. For family historians, expect records on loyalty oaths, forfeitures, military service, and land issues. Nuances include shifting council personnel (including bishops) and the council’s role during absences of the monarch or parliamentary dominance. Edge cases: Gaps in registers and the blending of Scottish affairs with British-wide conflicts.

Second Series: Volume 1
(1625 – 1627)

Second Series, Volume 1 / Page cxi (Introductory Material)

Date: Pre-Reformation (context provided in the 1625–1627 edition) 

Guthrie(s) Identified: Guthrie (in Angus) – Collegiate Church / Provostry

Role (within the document): Listed as one of the collegiate churches / provostries in Scotland

Summary Transcription (Guthrie-focused portion only): “…Dumbarton, Foulis and Guthrie in Angus, Kilmun in Argyleshire, Abernethy, Methven, and Tullibardine in Perthshire, Kilmaurs and Minibole in Ayrshire, Semple in Renfrewshire, Cullen in Banffshire, and Tain in Ross-shire.”

Modern English rendering: Among the collegiate churches and provostries in Scotland were those of Dumbarton, Foulis and Guthrie in Angus, Kilmun in Argyleshire, Abernethy, Methven, and Tullibardine in Perthshire, Kilmaurs and Minibole in Ayrshire, Semple in Renfrewshire, Cullen in Banffshire, and Tain in Ross-shire.

Historical Significance: This passage appears in the introductory material of the Second Series, Volume 1, within a broader discussion of Scottish Church lands and revenues before the Reformation. It identifies Guthrie in Angus as one of approximately forty collegiate churches or provostries that existed in Scotland prior to the Reformation. These institutions were distinct from both monastic houses and ordinary parish churches, often endowed with lands and revenues to support a provost and prebendaries. The mention confirms Guthrie’s status as a significant ecclesiastical centre in Angus during the late medieval period.

Genealogical Significance: The recognition of Guthrie as a collegiate church/provostry provides important context for the multiple Guthrie family references found elsewhere in the volume and its index (particularly around pages cxxxi–cxxxii). It helps explain why members of the Guthrie of that Ilk family appear in connection with the kirk of Guthrie, including Gabriel Guthrie recorded as Provost of Guthrie. This background strengthens the understanding of the family’s historical ties to both the lands and the ecclesiastical institution at Guthrie in Angus.

Ruling Authority / Legal Terms / Scottish Practices:

Ruling Authority: Pre-Reformation Scottish Church (context provided in a 17th-century Privy Council register edition).

Legal Terms:

• Collegiate Church / Provostry (an ecclesiastical foundation with a provost and prebendaries, distinct from monastic or simple parish structures)

Scottish Practices: Before the Reformation, collegiate churches were established across Scotland, often by noble families or through royal patronage. They served both religious and social functions, with endowments of land and teinds supporting a staff of clergy. The listing of Guthrie alongside other collegiate churches in Angus and neighbouring counties reflects its recognized status within this pre-Reformation ecclesiastical structure.

Second Series, Volume 1 / Page cxxxii (Introductory Material)

Date: 1567 (with later litigation before the Privy Council) 

Guthrie(s) Identified:

• Gabriel Guthrie (son of the Laird of Guthrie)
• Andrew Guthrie (son of the Laird of Guthrie)
• Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk (hereditary patron)

Role (within the document): Recipients of the Provostry and a Prebendry of Guthrie via grant from Regent Moray

Summary Transcription (Guthrie-focused portion only): “Two of the Provostries in this last list of eight, viz. that of Guthrie in Forfarshire… The hereditary patron of the Kirk of Guthrie being the Laird of Guthrie, known as Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk, he had, in virtue of the powers conceded to him by the Act of Regent Moray’s Parliament of 1567, conferred the Provostry, when it became vacant, on his own son, Gabriel Guthrie, to serve as a bursary for that youth during his education at the University of St. Andrews, and one of the Prebendries at the same time on another of his sons, Andrew Guthrie, for the same purpose. This clever family arrangement had been contested, but had been upheld by the Council.”

Modern English rendering: The hereditary patron of the Kirk of Guthrie being the Laird of Guthrie, known as Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk, had, by virtue of powers granted by the Act of Regent Moray’s Parliament of 1567, conferred the Provostry on his own son, Gabriel Guthrie, as a bursary during his education at the University of St. Andrews, and one of the Prebendries on another son, Andrew Guthrie. This family arrangement was contested but upheld by the Council.

Historical Significance: This detailed passage explains how the Provostry of Guthrie was granted in 1567 by the hereditary patron, Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk, to his sons Gabriel and Andrew Guthrie following legislation passed during the regency of the Earl of Moray. The arrangement allowed the benefices to function as educational bursaries. Although contested, the Privy Council upheld the grant, illustrating how noble families adapted pre-Reformation church patronage to support their children’s education in the new Protestant order.

Genealogical Significance: This is a key genealogical record for the Guthrie of that Ilk family. It confirms:

• Alexander Guthrie of that Ilk as hereditary patron of the Kirk of Guthrie in 1567.
• His sons Gabriel Guthrie (granted the Provostry) and Andrew Guthrie (granted a Prebendry).
• The family’s successful use of the 1567 Act to secure these positions, later upheld by the Privy Council.

Ruling Authority / Legal Terms / Scottish Practices:

Ruling Authority: Regent Moray’s Parliament (1567); later upheld by the Privy Council.

Legal Terms:

• Provostry / Prebendry
• Bursary (educational endowment)
• Hereditary patron

Scottish Practices: The adaptation of pre-Reformation church patronage by noble families after the Reformation, using legislation to convert benefices into educational support for their children while maintaining family control over local church positions.

Second Series, Volume 1 / Page cxli (Introductory Material)

Date: After 1623 (following the death of Alexander Douglas) 

Guthrie(s) Identified: John Guthrie, Bishop of Moray

Role (within the document): Bishop of Moray

Summary Transcription (Guthrie-focused portion only): “Bishopric of Moray: Alexander Douglas till his death in 1623; then John Guthrie.”

Modern English rendering: Bishopric of Moray: Alexander Douglas until his death in 1623; then John Guthrie.

Historical Significance: This entry appears in the introductory overview of Scottish bishoprics during the early seventeenth century. It records that John Guthriesucceeded Alexander Douglas as Bishop of Moray following the latter’s death in 1623. This reflects the ongoing appointments to episcopal sees during the reign of James VI and the early years of Charles I, a period marked by efforts to strengthen episcopacy in Scotland.

Genealogical Significance: This confirms that a John Guthrie held the position of Bishop of Moray from 1623 onward. It aligns with earlier index references noting a John Guthrie in connection with significant offices and commissions. Further research may determine whether this is the same individual referenced elsewhere in the volume (e.g., in justiciary commissions or conventions) or a different member of the extended Guthrie family who rose to high ecclesiastical office.

Ruling Authority / Legal Terms / Scottish Practices:

Ruling Authority: James VI (until 1625) and Charles I (from 1625); episcopal appointments during the period of strengthened episcopacy in Scotland.

Legal Terms:

• Bishopric (diocese under a bishop)

Scottish Practices: The pattern of episcopal succession in post-Reformation Scotland, where bishops were appointed by the Crown and often moved between sees (translation). The death of one bishop frequently led to rapid replacement by another clergyman, as seen in the succession from Alexander Douglas to John Guthrie in Moray.

Second Series, Volume 1 / Page 136

Date: 1625 

Guthrie(s) Identified: John Guthrie, Bishop of Moray

Role (within the document): Recipient of a royal commission to suppress Catholic and superstitious practices in the diocese of Moray

Summary Transcription (Guthrie-focused portion only): “…his Maiesty, with advice of the Lords of Secreit Councell, ‘hes maid and constitute, and be the tennour heirof makis and constitutes, the reverend father in God, Johne, Bishop of Murray, and the baillie of the regalitie of Spynie and his deputtis, conjunctlie and severallie, his Maiesties justiceis in that pairt for putting of the said Act of Parliament to dew and full executioun in all poyntis aganis all and sindrie personis contravenaris of the said Act within the boundis of the said diocie of Murray’…”

Modern English rendering: …his Majesty, with advice of the Lords of Secret Council, has made and constituted, and by the tenor hereof makes and constitutes, the reverend father in God, John, Bishop of Moray, and the baillie of the regality of Spynie and his deputies, conjunctly and severally, his Majesty’s justices in that part for putting the said Act of Parliament to due and full execution in all points against all and sundry persons contraveners of the said Act within the bounds of the said diocese of Moray…

Historical Significance: This commission (1625) grants John Guthrie, Bishop of Moray, along with the baillie of the regality of Spynie, judicial authority to enforce an Act of Parliament against Catholic and superstitious practices in the diocese of Moray. The commission specifically targets pilgrimages to chapels, wells, and crosses, the singing of carols, and other “Papisticall rites.” It reflects the ongoing efforts of the Crown and the Reformed Kirk to suppress residual Catholic practices in the north of Scotland during the reign of Charles I.

Genealogical Significance: This is an important early record of John Guthrieexercising authority as Bishop of Moray. It confirms that he held the bishopric by 1625 and was entrusted with significant judicial powers in his diocese to enforce religious conformity. This aligns with the index reference noting a “commission of justiciary to him, 136.”

Ruling Authority / Legal Terms / Scottish Practices:

Ruling Authority: Charles I (with advice of the Privy Council).

Legal Terms:

• Commission of justiciary (grant of judicial powers to enforce specific laws)
• Supersticiall and Papisticall rites (Catholic and traditional practices deemed superstitious)

Scottish Practices: The use of targeted commissions granting local ecclesiastical and secular officials judicial powers to enforce religious legislation, particularly against residual Catholicism in the Highlands and north-east of Scotland.

Second Series, Volume 1 / Page clxxvi (Introductory Material)

Date: Late 1626 / early 1627 (in the context of the Revocation Edict) 

Guthrie(s) Identified: John Guthrie, Bishop of Moray

Role (within the document): Member of the clerical deputation sent to London regarding Charles I’s Revocation Edict

Summary Transcription (Guthrie-focused portion only): “That from the Clergy consisted of Patrick Lindsay, Bishop of Ross, John Guthrie, Bishop of Moray, and Messrs. Walter Whiteford and William Struthers, ministers, and that from the Nobles and Lairds of the Earl of Rothes, the Earl of Linlithgow, and Lord Loudoun, these three selected…”

Modern English rendering: The deputation from the Clergy consisted of Patrick Lindsay, Bishop of Ross, John Guthrie, Bishop of Moray, and Messrs. Walter Whiteford and William Struthers, ministers.

Historical Significance: This passage appears in the introductory discussion of Charles I’s Revocation Edict (1626–1627). It records that John Guthrie, Bishop of Moray, was one of four clergy representatives chosen to travel to London as part of a deputation to remonstrate with the King. The deputation was formed after delays in implementing the Revocation Edict and amid growing concern among Scottish nobles, lairds, and clergy about its impact on land rights and church revenues. This reflects the significant political role played by Scottish bishops during the early years of Charles I’s reign.

Genealogical Significance: This entry further documents the prominence of John Guthrie as Bishop of Moray. His selection as one of the clerical deputies sent to London demonstrates that he held a position of influence within both the Church and the political affairs of Scotland in the mid-1620s. It builds on the previous record of his succession to the bishopric in 1623.

Ruling Authority / Legal Terms / Scottish Practices:

Ruling Authority: Charles I (reigned from 1625).

Legal Terms:

• Revocation Edict (Charles I’s policy aimed at recovering Crown and church lands granted away since 1540)

Scottish Practices: The use of deputations (formal delegations) sent to the King in London to present grievances or negotiate on major policy matters affecting Scotland, particularly those involving land, patronage, and church revenues.

Second Series, Volume 1 / Page clxxxii (Introductory Material)

Date: 1626–1627 (New Commission on the Revocation Edict) 

Guthrie(s) Identified: John Guthrie, Bishop of Moray

Role (within the document): One of the nine prelates included in the large Commission dealing with Charles I’s Revocation Edict

Summary Transcription (Guthrie-focused portion only): “Nine Prelates in addition to Spotswood, viz.: Archbishop Law of Glasgow, and the Bishops of Dunkeld (Alexander Lindsay), Aberdeen (Patrick Forbes), Moray (John Guthrie), Ross (Patrick Lindsay), Galloway (Andrew Lamb), Dunblane (Adam Bellenden), Brechin (David Lindsay), and Caithness (John Abernethy).”

Modern English rendering: Nine Prelates in addition to Spotswood, viz.: … and the Bishops of … Moray (John Guthrie) …

Historical Significance: This passage describes the composition of the large New Commission (68 members) established to implement Charles I’s Revocation Edict. John Guthrie, Bishop of Moray, was included among the nine prelates (bishops) appointed to the Commission. The Commission was tasked with negotiating surrenders of rights affected by the Revocation, particularly concerning church lands, teinds, and temporalities. The inclusion of multiple bishops reflects the Crown’s strategy of involving senior clergy in resolving these contentious issues. A footnote further clarifies that vacancies among the clerical commissioners were to be supplied by the Bishops of Moray, Whithorn, Brechin, and Caithness.

Genealogical Significance: This entry further demonstrates the prominent role of John Guthrie as Bishop of Moray in national affairs during 1626–1627. His appointment to this major Commission, alongside other leading bishops, confirms his standing within both the Church and the political administration of Scotland under Charles I.

Ruling Authority / Legal Terms / Scottish Practices:

Ruling Authority: Charles I.

Legal Terms:

• Revocation Edict / Commission on Revocation
• Prelates (bishops and archbishops)

Scottish Practices: The use of large, broadly representative Commissions to negotiate and implement major royal policies, especially those involving land, church revenues, and the rights of nobles, lairds, and the Church. These Commissions often included members from the Nobility, Prelates, Knights/Lairds, and Burgesses to give the process legitimacy.

Second Series, Volume 1 / Page 141

Date: 1625 (missive regarding Convention of Estates on 27 October 1625) 

Guthrie(s) Identified: John Guthrie, Bishop of Moray

Role (within the document): Recipient of a missive summoning him to the Convention of Estates

Summary Transcription (Guthrie-focused portion only): “…And, forder, missives wer directit to the Marques of Huntlie, the Earlis Mairshaell, Murray, Rothes, Montrois, Eglintoun, Cassillis, Menteith, Buchane, Kinghorne, Galloway, the Vicount of Stormonth, the Lordis Ogilvy, Elphingstoun, Boyd, Burley, Ross, Semple, Yester, Gray, Balmerinocht, Torphichine, Colvill, Ramsay, Spynie, Lowdoun, Blantyre; bishops of Murray, Brechin, Galloway, Caithness, Abirdene; …”

Modern English rendering: …And, further, missives were directed to the Marquis of Huntly, the Earls Marischal, Murray, Rothes, Montrose, Eglinton, Cassillis, Menteith, Buchan, Kinghorne, Galloway, the Viscount of Stormonth, the Lords Ogilvy, Elphinstone, Boyd, Burley, Ross, Semple, Yester, Gray, Balmerinoch, Torphichen, Colvill, Ramsay, Spynie, Loudoun, Blantyre; bishops of Murray, Brechin, Galloway, Caithness, Aberdeen; …

Historical Significance: This entry records that missives (formal summonses) were sent in 1625 to various nobles, bishops, and burgh representatives regarding a Convention of Estates to be held on 27 October 1625. John Guthrie, Bishop of Moray, is included among the bishops who received the summons. This reflects the standard practice of involving the senior clergy in national conventions during the early reign of Charles I.

Genealogical Significance: This provides further evidence of John Guthrie’s active role as Bishop of Moray in 1625, showing that he was regularly included in national political and ecclesiastical business alongside other leading bishops. It aligns with the index reference noting that he was “written for to be present at the Convention of Estates, 141.”

Ruling Authority / Legal Terms / Scottish Practices:

Ruling Authority: Charles I.

Legal Terms:

• Missive (formal letter or summons)
• Convention of Estates (national assembly of nobles, clergy, and burgh representatives)

Scottish Practices: The use of formal missives to summon bishops and other Estates to Conventions, ensuring representation from the Church in national decision-making.

Second Series, Volume 1 / Page 150

Date: 27 October 1625 

Guthrie(s) Identified: John Guthrie, Bishop of Moray

Role (within the document): Attendee at the Convention of Estates

Summary Transcription (Guthrie-focused portion only): “Bishoppis—Dunkeld; Abirdene; Murray; Galloway; Brechin; Dumblane; Caithnes: …”

Modern English rendering: Bishops — Dunkeld; Aberdeen; Murray; Galloway; Brechin; Dunblane; Caithness: …

Historical Significance: This entry records the attendees at the Convention of Estates held on 27 October 1625. John Guthrie, Bishop of Moray, is listed among the bishops present. The Convention was a national assembly of the Estates (Nobles, Bishops, and Burgesses) called to address important matters of state. The inclusion of the Bishop of Moray reflects the continued role of senior clergy in national political gatherings during the early reign of Charles I.

Genealogical Significance: This provides further confirmation that John Guthriewas actively serving as Bishop of Moray in October 1625 and was participating in national assemblies. It aligns with the index reference noting that he was “present at the Convention of Estates, 150.”

Ruling Authority / Legal Terms / Scottish Practices:

Ruling Authority: Charles I.

Legal Terms:

• Convention of Estates (national assembly representing the three Estates: Nobles, Clergy, and Burgesses)

Scottish Practices: The regular inclusion of bishops in Conventions of Estates, allowing the Church to be represented in discussions on major national issues such as taxation, legislation, and royal policy.

Second Series, Volume 1 / Page clxxxii (Introductory Material)

Date: 1626–1627 (New Commission on the Revocation Edict) 

Guthrie(s) Identified: John Guthrie, Bishop of Moray

Role (within the document): One of the nine prelates included in the large Commission dealing with Charles I’s Revocation Edict

Summary Transcription (Guthrie-focused portion only): “Nine Prelates in addition to Spotswood, viz.: Archbishop Law of Glasgow, and the Bishops of Dunkeld (Alexander Lindsay), Aberdeen (Patrick Forbes), Moray (John Guthrie), Ross (Patrick Lindsay), Galloway (Andrew Lamb), Dunblane (Adam Bellenden), Brechin (David Lindsay), and Caithness (John Abernethy).”

Modern English rendering: Nine Prelates in addition to Spotswood, viz.: … and the Bishops of … Moray (John Guthrie) …

Historical Significance: This passage describes the composition of the large New Commission (68 members) established to implement Charles I’s Revocation Edict. John Guthrie, Bishop of Moray, was included among the nine prelates (bishops) appointed to the Commission. The Commission was tasked with negotiating surrenders of rights affected by the Revocation, particularly concerning church lands, teinds, and temporalities. The inclusion of multiple bishops reflects the Crown’s strategy of involving senior clergy in resolving these contentious issues.

Genealogical Significance: This entry further demonstrates the prominent role of John Guthrie as Bishop of Moray in national affairs during 1626–1627. His appointment to this major Commission, alongside other leading bishops, confirms his standing within both the Church and the political administration of Scotland under Charles I.

Ruling Authority / Legal Terms / Scottish Practices:

Ruling Authority: Charles I.

Legal Terms:

• Revocation Edict / Commission on Revocation
• Prelates (bishops and archbishops)

Scottish Practices: The use of large, broadly representative Commissions to negotiate and implement major royal policies, especially those involving land, church revenues, and the rights of nobles, lairds, and the Church. These Commissions often included members from the Nobility, Prelates, Knights/Lairds, and Burgesses to give the process legitimacy.

Second Series, Volume 1 / Page 275

Date: 5th and 6th April 1626 

Guthrie(s) Identified: John Guthrie, writer

Role (within the document): Writer (notary) who witnessed a bond of caution

Summary Transcription (Guthrie-focused portion only): “…and John Miller, John Guthrie, and John M‘Caulay, writers. Alexander Fleming, being unable to write, signs by two notaries, Robert Kirkwoode, and James Kirkwood, his servitor.”

Modern English rendering: …and John Miller, John Guthrie, and John McCaulay, writers. Alexander Fleming, being unable to write, signs by two notaries, Robert Kirkwood and James Kirkwood, his servitor.

Historical Significance: This entry records the registration of a bond of caution(surety bond) given by Patrick Fleming of Carbrain in April 1626. The bond related to a fine imposed on Alexander Fleming of Mones for the reset of the Clan Gregor, following a decree of the Lords dated 15 September 1613. John Guthrie is named among the writers (notaries) who witnessed the bond. This reflects the routine legal and administrative work carried out by professional writers/notaries in early seventeenth-century Scotland, particularly in matters involving bonds, cautions, and the enforcement of court decrees.

Genealogical Significance: This is the first main-text entry (as opposed to introductory material) for a John Guthrie recorded as a writer (notary). It matches the earlier index reference to “John, writer, witness to a bond, 275.” This John Guthrie appears to have been a professional legal writer active in Edinburgh in 1626, distinct from the John Guthrie who served as Bishop of Moray during the same period.

Ruling Authority / Legal Terms / Scottish Practices:

Ruling Authority: Charles I (reigned from 1625).

Legal Terms:

• Bond of caution (surety bond)
• Reset of the Clan Gregor (harbouring or assisting members of the proscribed Clan Gregor)
• Writers (notaries or legal scribes)

Scottish Practices: The widespread use of bonds of caution to guarantee payment of fines or compliance with court decrees. Professional writers/notaries played an essential role in drafting, witnessing, and registering such legal documents, especially when one of the parties was illiterate and required notarial attestation.

Second Series, Volume 1 / Page 457

Date: 1 December 1626 (at Leith) 

Guthrie(s) Identified: John Guthrie, Bishop of Moray

Role (within the document): Member of the clerical deputation sent to represent matters to the King regarding the Revocation Edict

Summary Transcription (Guthrie-focused portion only): “…consisting of Patrick Lindsay, Bishop of Ross, John Guthrie, Bishop of Moray, and Messrs. Walter Whiteford and William Struthers, ministers, to proceed to Court and represent matters to his Majesty. The presence at Court of such a clerical deputation was all the more necessary because the Scottish nobles, after much deliberation over the interests of their own order as imperilled by the Revocation, had just appointed a similar deputation to his Majesty on that business, consisting of the Earl of Rothes, the Earl of Linlithgow, and Lord Loudoun, three of the youngest and most promising of the Scottish nobility.”

Modern English rendering: …consisting of Patrick Lindsay, Bishop of Ross, John Guthrie, Bishop of Moray, and Messrs. Walter Whiteford and William Struthers, ministers, to proceed to Court and represent matters to his Majesty.

Historical Significance: This minute from 1 December 1626 records that John Guthrie, Bishop of Moray, was one of four clergy members appointed to a formal deputation sent to the King to represent the interests of the Church in relation to Charles I’s Revocation Edict. The entry notes that the clerical deputation was considered especially necessary because the nobility had already sent their own deputation (Earl of Rothes, Earl of Linlithgow, and Lord Loudoun) on the same matter. This reflects the serious tensions between the Crown, the nobility, and the Church over the Revocation policy in late 1626. (Also referenced in a footnote on page 466.)

Genealogical Significance: This is a clear, dated record of John Guthrie acting in his capacity as Bishop of Moray in a politically sensitive national matter. It confirms his active involvement in high-level negotiations with the Crown during the early years of Charles I’s reign and aligns with the earlier introductory references to his participation in deputations concerning the Revocation Edict.

Ruling Authority / Legal Terms / Scottish Practices:

Ruling Authority: Charles I.

Legal Terms:

• Revocation Edict
• Deputation (formal delegation sent to the King)

Scottish Practices: The practice of sending formal deputations (composed of representatives from the Nobility and the Clergy) to the King in London to present grievances or negotiate on major policy issues affecting Scotland, particularly those involving land rights and church revenues.

Second Series, Volume 1 / Page 500

Date: 18th and 20th January 1627 

Guthrie(s) Identified: Henrie Guthrie (skipper, burgess of Dundee)

Role (within the document): Cautioner (surety) in a bond related to Letters of Marque

Summary Transcription (Guthrie-focused portion only): “(2) Bond of Caution by Patrick Kynnaird, William Coppine, Henrie Guthrie, Alexander Blair, and Patrick Stevinsoun, skippers, William Rodger, skinner, and James Ramsay and Thomas Broun, maltmen, burgesses of Dundie, that Thomas Auchinlek, captain of the ship called The Goldin Lyoun of Dundie, will make lawful use of the letters of marque granted to him, dated 16th January instant… The bond is dated at Edinburgh and Dundie, 18th and 20th January 1627…”

Modern English rendering: Bond of Caution by Patrick Kynnaird, William Coppine, Henrie Guthrie, Alexander Blair, and Patrick Stevinson, skippers… that Thomas Auchinlek, captain of the ship called The Goldin Lyoun of Dundie, will make lawful use of the letters of marque granted to him…

Historical Significance: This entry records the registration of a bond of caution(surety bond) given in January 1627 by several Dundee merchants and skippers, including Henrie Guthrie. The bond guaranteed that Captain Thomas Auchinlek would lawfully use the Letters of Marque (privateering commission) granted to him against the common enemy. This reflects Scotland’s involvement in privateering activities during the Anglo-Spanish and Anglo-French conflicts of the 1620s, when the Crown issued letters of marque to merchant captains to attack enemy shipping.

Genealogical Significance: This entry confirms that a Henrie Guthrie, described as a skipper and burgess of Dundee, was active in maritime and commercial affairs in early 1627. It matches the earlier index reference to “Henry, skipper, burgess of Dundee, bond of caution by him, 500.” This provides a useful anchor for identifying members of the Guthrie family involved in Dundee’s shipping and trading community in the early seventeenth century.

Ruling Authority / Legal Terms / Scottish Practices:

Ruling Authority: Charles I.

Legal Terms:

• Bond of Caution (surety bond)
• Letters of Marque (commission authorising privateers to attack enemy vessels)

Scottish Practices: The use of bonds of caution to guarantee the lawful conduct of captains holding letters of marque. These bonds were routinely registered in the Privy Council records to ensure accountability and provide financial security for any damages caused by privateering activities.

Second Series, Volume 1 / Page 510

Date: 3 February 1627 

Guthrie(s) Identified: John Guthrie, Bishop of Moray

Role (within the document): Appointed Commissioner for Surrenders and Teinds (Revocation Commission)

Summary Transcription (Guthrie-focused portion only): “…our right trustie and well-beloved father in God and our right trustie and well-beloved counsellor, John, Bishop of Murray; the reverend father in God and our well-beloved counsellor, Patrick, Bishop of Rosse; …”

Modern English rendering: …our right trusty and well-beloved father in God and our right trusty and well-beloved counsellor, John, Bishop of Moray; the reverend father in God and our well-beloved counsellor, Patrick, Bishop of Ross; …

Historical Significance: This is the official Royal Proclamation of 3 February 1627 appointing a large Commission to deal with surrenders and teinds arising from Charles I’s Revocation Edict. John Guthrie, Bishop of Moray, is explicitly named as one of the Commissioners. The Commission was given wide powers to negotiate with landholders, arrange compositions, divide parishes, and secure teinds for the Church and Crown. This document represents the formal, public appointment of the Commission whose composition was discussed in the introductory material (page clxxxii).

Genealogical Significance: This is a strong primary-source confirmation that John Guthrie was officially appointed as a Commissioner in February 1627. It builds on the earlier introductory references and demonstrates his continued prominence in national affairs during the implementation of the Revocation policy.

Ruling Authority / Legal Terms / Scottish Practices:

Ruling Authority: Charles I.

Legal Terms:

• Royal Proclamation / Commission for Surrenders and Teinds
• Revocation Edict

Scottish Practices: The use of large royal commissions, formally appointed by proclamation, to negotiate and settle complex national issues involving land, teinds, and church revenues. These commissions often included a mix of nobles, bishops, judges, and burgh representatives.

Second Series, Volume 1 / Page 611

Date: 23 May 1627 

Guthrie(s) Identified: Richard Guthrie, servitor to Mr John Schairp of Houstoun, advocate

Role (within the document): Witness to a bond of caution

Summary Transcription (Guthrie-focused portion only): “The bond is dated at Edinburgh 23rd May 1627: witnesses, Richard Guthrie, servitor to Mr John Schairp of Houstoun, advocate, and John Kincaid, servitor to the cautioner, and writer of the bond.”

Modern English rendering: The bond is dated at Edinburgh 23rd May 1627: witnesses, Richard Guthrie, servitor to Mr John Schairp of Houstoun, advocate, and John Kincaid, servitor to the cautioner, and writer of the bond.

Historical Significance: This entry records the registration of a bond of cautiongiven by Hew Tod, writer to the Signet, on behalf of Margaret Porterfield. The bond was intended to prevent her from molesting John Mayne in Schyresmilne. Richard Guthrieappears as one of the witnesses in his capacity as servitor (personal servant or clerk) to the prominent advocate Mr John Schairp of Houstoun. This reflects the important role played by legal professionals and their servants in the routine registration of bonds and legal instruments in early seventeenth-century Edinburgh.

Genealogical Significance: This entry confirms the existence of a Richard Guthriewho was employed as a servitor to the advocate Mr John Schairp of Houstoun in May 1627. It matches the earlier index reference to “Guthrie, Richard, servitor to Mr John Sharp of Houston, witness to a bond, 611.” This provides a useful point of identification for a member of the Guthrie family working in the legal profession in Edinburgh during the 1620s.

Ruling Authority / Legal Terms / Scottish Practices:

Ruling Authority: Charles I.

Legal Terms:

• Bond of Caution (surety bond)
• Servitor (personal servant or clerk, often to a lawyer or laird)

Scottish Practices: The widespread use of bonds of caution to prevent molestation or ensure good behaviour, and the routine witnessing of such documents by legal professionals and their servitors. Registration in the Privy Council records gave these bonds official force.

Second Series, Volume 1 / Page 691

Date: 11 June 1627 

Guthrie(s) Identified: Mr James Guthrie, minister at Urquhart

Role (within the document): Minister of Urquhart; signatory to a parish report

Summary Transcription (Guthrie-focused portion only): “Innes, ane Justice off Peace, Johne Chalmer, ane elder, Robert Dunbar, ane of the elderis, Mark Miller, ane of the elderis, David Dunbar, elder, Michaell Stronoche, elder, Michaell Mawer, elder, James Andersone, elder, Johne Innes, M. James Guthre, minister at Urquhart.”

Modern English rendering: Innes, a Justice of Peace, John Chalmer, an elder, Robert Dunbar, one of the elders, Mark Miller, one of the elders, David Dunbar, elder, Michael Stronach, elder, Michael Mawer, elder, James Anderson, elder, John Innes, Mr James Guthrie, minister at Urquhart.

Historical Significance: This document is a report from the parish of Urquhart (dated 11 June 1627) listing “unprofitable and maisterles personis” (masterless or vagrant persons) who could be removed or employed in the King’s military service in Germany. Mr James Guthrie, as minister of the parish, is one of the signatories alongside the Justice of Peace and several elders. The report reflects the Scottish government’s efforts in 1627 to recruit men for service abroad during the Thirty Years’ War period.

Genealogical Significance: This entry confirms that a Mr James Guthrie was serving as minister at Urquhart in June 1627. It matches the earlier index reference to “Mr James Guthrie, minister of Urquhart, subscribes a report from the parish of Urquhart, 690, 691.” This is a useful identification point for a clergyman of the Guthrie name active in Moray during the 1620s.

Ruling Authority / Legal Terms / Scottish Practices:

Ruling Authority: Charles I.

Legal Terms:

• Maisterles personis (masterless/vagrant persons)
• Lewing of unprofitable and maisterles personis (removal or conscription of vagrants)

Scottish Practices: The practice of parishes compiling lists of masterless persons who could be pressed into military service abroad, often as part of Scotland’s contribution to continental wars. Ministers and kirk sessions frequently assisted in identifying and reporting such individuals.

Second Series: Volume 2
(1627-1628)

Second Series, Volume II / Page 53

Date: 13 September 1627 (meeting date specified; document from Acts March 1625–January 1628) 

Guthrie(s) Identified: Laird of Guthrie (Peter Guthrie or immediate predecessor)

Role (within the document): Named as one of the local lairds commissioned (or any four of the listed group) to convene and advise on coastal fortifications.

Summary Transcription (Guthrie-focused portion only): “…and to the Lairds of Din, Innerquharatie, Lawrestoun, Aldbar, Morphie, Bony toun, Ethie, Balmain, Leyes, Guthrie, and Newgrange, or anie foure of thame, the Lords Ogilvie and Carnegie or either of thame being ane of the foure, to conveene and meete at the burgh of Monrose upoun the thretten day of September nixt…”

Modern English rendering: “…and to the Lairds of [various Angus properties including] Guthrie, and Newgrange, or any four of them (with the Lords Ogilvie and Carnegie or one of them being one of the four), to convene and meet at the burgh of Montrose upon the thirteenth day of September next…”

Historical Significance: This commission, issued under Charles I, addresses coastal defense concerns amid fears of enemy (likely Spanish or other foreign) invasion during a period of heightened European tensions. It organizes local lairds and nobles in Angus and Fife to assess and plan fortifications at key harbors like Montrose, Burntisland, and Inchgarvie. It reflects the Privy Council’s role in coordinating regional responses to national security threats through ad hoc commissions.

Genealogical Significance: The reference places the Laird of Guthrie as a recognized landholder and community leader among prominent Angus families (Ogilvie, Carnegie, etc.) in 1627. This aligns with the late main line of Guthrie of that Ilk, which faced financial difficulties and internal issues. Peter Guthrie (son of Patrick) held the position at this time; his retour (inheritance confirmation) is dated 24 May 1636. Shortly thereafter, on 29 December 1636, Peter disponed the barony of Guthrie to his kinsman John Guthrie, Bishop of Moray, ending direct ownership by the ancient male line after nearly two centuries.

Ruling Authority / Legal Terms / Scottish Practices: Ruling Authority: Charles I (reigned 1625–1649). Legal Terms: “Commission” (formal grant of authority); “Lairds of [place]” (designation by landholding); “conveene and meete” (convene); “ordour and direction” (orders). Scottish Practices: Use of regional laird commissions for defense and infrastructure; quorum-based decision-making (any four of listed); reliance on local landowners for implementation of Privy Council directives.

Second Series, Volume II / Page 71

Date: 13 September 1627 

Guthrie(s) Identified: D. Guthrie of that Ilk (David Guthrie of Guthrie) 

Role (within the document): Commissioner and signatory of the report on proposed fortification sites and funding near Montrose.

Summary Transcription (Guthrie-focused portion only): “…Montrois the 13 of September 1627. Sic subscribitur, Carnegie, Lyone, Areskine, Bony toun, D. Gardyne, Grahame of Morphie, J. Carnegie of Athie, D. Guthrie of that Ilk, Francis Ogilvie.”

Modern English rendering: “…Montrose the 13 of September 1627. Thus subscribed, [list of commissioners including] D. Guthrie of that Ilk…”

Historical Significance: This is the commissioners’ follow-up report to the Privy Council detailing their on-site assessment of fortification locations and recommended funding via local heritors and burgh contributions. It demonstrates the practical execution of the earlier commission, with local lairds actively participating in defense planning under royal authority during Charles I’s reign.

Genealogical Significance: Directly identifies D. Guthrie of that Ilk (David Guthrie) as the active Laird of Guthrie in September 1627, participating alongside neighboring Angus lairds. This fits the late main line: Peter Guthrie’s retour is dated 24 May 1636; he disponed the barony to kinsman Bishop John Guthrie of Moray on 29 December 1636, ending direct ancient male-line ownership. The 1627 reference confirms the family’s standing shortly before the estate transfer.

Ruling Authority / Legal Terms / Scottish Practices:

• Ruling Authority: Charles I. 
• Legal Terms: “Commissioners appointed to superintend”; “Sic subscribitur” (thus subscribed); “heretours and burgesses.” 
• Scottish Practices: Local laird commissions submitting formal reports to the Privy Council; collective subscription by commissioners; voluntary local contributions for public defense works.

Second Series, Volume II / Page 170

Date: 1627 (within Acts March 1625–January 1628) 

Guthrie(s) Identified:

• David Guthrie of that Ilk
• William Guthrie of Maines

Role (within the document):

• David Guthrie of that Ilk: Appointed commissioner to take trial of the number and qualities of fensible persons in the parishes of Guthrie, Kirkbuddo, and Carmyllie.
• William Guthrie of Maines: Appointed commissioner for the parish of Tannadys.

Summary Transcription (Guthrie-focused portion only): “…for the parishes of Guthrie, Kirkbuddo and Carmyllie, David Guthrie of that Ilk; … and for the parish of Tannadys, William Guthrie of Maines…”

Modern English rendering: “…for the parishes of Guthrie, Kirkbuddo and Carmyllie, David Guthrie of that Ilk; … and for the parish of Tannadys, William Guthrie of Maines…”

Historical Significance: This Privy Council act under Charles I directs justices of the peace and appointed local leaders (including ministers) to survey and organize able-bodied men (“fensible persons”) for military training and readiness across Forfarshire parishes. It reflects efforts to enforce royal directives for national defense and militia readiness, with penalties (hornings) for non-compliance. The appointments leverage local lairds for parish-level implementation.

Genealogical Significance:

• David Guthrie of that Ilk is confirmed as the primary Laird of Guthrie in 1627, directly responsible for his own parish and adjacent areas — consistent with his role in the September coastal defense commission. This precedes the 1636 retour of Peter Guthrie and the subsequent sale to Bishop John Guthrie.
• William Guthrie of Maines represents a cadet or related branch holding lands in Tannadys parish. Both entries affirm the Guthrie family’s prominent landholding and administrative roles in Angus at this time.

Ruling Authority / Legal Terms / Scottish Practices:

• Ruling Authority: Charles I. 
• Legal Terms: “Taking of tryell”; “fensible persons”; “hornings”; “letters of horning”; “escheat.” 
• Scottish Practices: Parish-based musters organized by local heritors/lairds; use of hornings (legal outlawry) for enforcement; Privy Council delegating defense responsibilities to shire justices and landowners.

Second Series, Volume II / Page 223

Date: November 1627–January 1628 (Decrees section) 

Guthrie(s) Identified: James Guthrie, writer (legal practitioner/notary) 

Role (within the document): Pursuer / creditor who obtained decree and caused the warding (imprisonment) of debtor James Cunningham; consents to the debtor’s liberation.

Summary Transcription (Guthrie-focused portion only): “Complaint and petition by James Cuninghame, tailor, burgess of Edinburgh, as follows: —He is warded in the tolbooth of Edinburgh at the instance of James Guthrie, writer, who has taken assignation of a decreet recovered against the complainer before the baillies of Leith…” “…and the said James Guthrie also compearing and consenting to the liberation of the pursuer…”

Modern English rendering: James Cunningham petitions for release from Edinburgh Tolbooth, where he was imprisoned at the instance of James Guthrie, writer, who had taken assignation of a debt decree. The Lords order his liberty after Guthrie consents, without prejudice to the lawful debt action.

Historical Significance: This decree illustrates routine Privy Council intervention in civil debt and imprisonment matters, balancing creditor rights with humanitarian considerations (Cunningham’s claim of impending starvation for himself and family). It shows the Council’s role in reviewing burgh court decisions and managing urban debtor cases in Edinburgh/Leith.

Genealogical Significance: Identifies a James Guthrie, writer active in Edinburgh legal circles in 1627–1628. This is likely a professional (not the Angus laird line), useful for distinguishing urban Guthries or potential cadet connections. No direct tie to Guthrie of that Ilk is indicated here.

Ruling Authority / Legal Terms / Scottish Practices:

• Ruling Authority: Charles I. 
• Legal Terms: “Assignation of a decreet”; “warded in the tolbooth”; “compearing and consenting”; “without prejudice to his lawful action.” 
• Scottish Practices: Use of tolbooths for civil debt imprisonment; assignation of decrees; Privy Council oversight of burgh justice and petitions for liberation.

Second Series, Volume II / Page 472

Date: 27 September 1628 

Guthrie(s) Identified: Mr. Alexander Guthrie, town clerk of Edinburgh 

Role (within the document): Cautioner (surety/guarantor) alongside others for William Dick’s handling of funds for levying and transporting troops for service to the King of Denmark.

Summary Transcription (Guthrie-focused portion only): “…and the third be Captane Donaldsoun and Mr. Alexander Guthrie, toun clerk of Edinburgh, his cautioner…”

Modern English rendering: “…and the third [band] by Captain Donaldson and Mr. Alexander Guthrie, town clerk of Edinburgh, his cautioner…”

Historical Significance: This letter from the Privy Council addresses accountability for funds raised for a military levy (900 men under Colonel Sinclair) intended for Danish service. It details cautionary bands (surety obligations) and requests confirmation of proper disbursement, reflecting Scotland’s involvement in European military affairs under Charles I and the use of Edinburgh officials in royal service.

Genealogical Significance: Identifies Mr. Alexander Guthrie, Town Clerk of Edinburgh, as a legal/administrative figure of standing in 1628, serving as a surety in a significant state financial/military matter. This urban professional Guthrie is distinct from the contemporary Angus laird line (David Guthrie of that Ilk). Useful for tracking Edinburgh-based Guthries or possible family connections.

Ruling Authority / Legal Terms / Scottish Practices:

• Ruling Authority: Charles I.
• Legal Terms: “Cautioner”; “band” (bond of surety); “testification of his diligence”; “persewing by ordour of law.”
• Scottish Practices: Use of cautionary obligations in state contracts; Privy Council oversight of military levies and accounts; formal letters from the Council to the sovereign.

Second Series, Volume II / Page 538

Date: 1628 (within Acts February 1628–July 1629) 

Guthrie(s) Identified: Mr. Alexander Guthrie 

Role (within the document): Personally present commissioner / promiser who undertook to warn (summon/notify) the burghs to appear on the specified day.

Summary Transcription (Guthrie-focused portion only): “Mr. Alexander Guthrie, who wer personallie present and promeist and undertooke to wairne the burrowes and to have thame heere that day.”

Modern English rendering: “Mr. Alexander Guthrie, who were personally present and promised and undertook to warn the burghs and to have them here that day.”

Historical Significance: This entry records Mr. Alexander Guthrie’s formal undertaking before the Lords to notify and ensure the attendance of burgh representatives. It reflects the Privy Council’s administrative processes for convening representatives from royal burghs on matters of national importance during Charles I’s reign.

Genealogical Significance: Reinforces the identification of Mr. Alexander Guthrie(Town Clerk of Edinburgh, as noted in the 27 September 1628 entry) as an active legal/administrative figure in Edinburgh. His repeated appearances in council records highlight his professional role and reliability in state matters, distinct from the Angus laird line.

Ruling Authority / Legal Terms / Scottish Practices:

• Ruling Authority: Charles I.
• Legal Terms: “Personallie present”; “promeist and undertooke”; “wairne the burrowes.”
• Scottish Practices: Personal appearance and formal undertakings before the Privy Council; use of burgh commissioners/warrants for collective representation; administrative summons of royal burghs.

Second Series, Volume II / Page 557 (cross-reference / variant of prior entry) 

Date: 13 September 1627 

Guthrie(s) Identified: D. Guthrie of that Ilk 

Role (within the document): Commissioner and signatory of the Montrose fortification report.

Summary Transcription (Guthrie-focused portion only): “…(Signed) Carnegy, Lyone, A. Erskine, Bony toun, D. Gardyne, R. Græme of Morphie, S. J. Carnegie, Athie, D. Guthrie of that Ilk, Fran. Ogilwye…”

Modern English rendering: Signed by … D. Guthrie of that Ilk …

Historical Significance: This is the signed version of the commissioners’ report on coastal fortifications at Montrose (previously processed from p. 71). It confirms the group’s on-site findings and recommendations for funding and further expert input.

Genealogical Significance: Reaffirms David Guthrie of that Ilk as the active Laird of Guthrie in September 1627, participating in regional defense commissions alongside other Angus lairds. Consistent with prior entries; estate transfer to Bishop John Guthrie followed in 1636.

Ruling Authority / Legal Terms / Scottish Practices:

• Ruling Authority: Charles I.
• Legal Terms: “Commission”; “signed” / subscription of report.
• Scottish Practices: Formal signed reports from ad hoc commissions to the Privy Council; use of seals (noted for Lord Carnegie).

Second Series: Volume 3
( 1629 – 1630)

WORK in PROGRESS

Second Series: Volume 4
(1630 – 1632)

WORK in PROGRESS

Second Series: Volume 5
(1633 – 1635)

WORK in PROGRESS

Second Series: Volume 6
(1635 – 1637)

WORK in PROGRESS

Second Series: Volume 7
(1638 – 1643)

WORK in PROGRESS

Second Series: Volume 8
(1644 – 1660)

WORK in PROGRESS